Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Just some historical perspective on the linebacker position

Fiz

By Fiz,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Fiz Newbie

Fiz

Posted
Posted

So let's go back to 2002. The Panthers signed a free agent linebacker, and he was maybe the best player on the team. The defense was arguably designed to flow to his position, and he performed.

I'm talking of course about Mark Fields.

After the 2002 season, he was diagnosed with non-hodgkins lymphoma and would miss the entire 2003 season.

In 2004, the Panters would stumble out of the gates (due largely to injuries) and would end with a furious charge that fell short due to a miracle play by mike vick and a Jake Game against the New Orleans Saints** in week 17. however, what most people don't remember is the late season charged was spurred by a game against the poo awful 49ers.

Specifically, on one play. An interception by Mark Fields.

It'd taken him nearly half a season to get back in the full swing of things. That play was the first step in a memorable charge to the playoffs that fell just short.

I'm bringing this up because of a similar situation the Panthers now face. Arguably the two best players on defense, Beason and Davis, are coming off of major injuries. Obviously nothing as serious as cancer, but football limiting injuries nonetheless.

I do not think the Panthers will benefit from the contributions of these two players until well into the season. Beason probably blew out his achilles because he rushed himself back last year. Davis, well, not so much. He was injured on a play that would have torn anyone's knee to pieces.

Still, I don't think either will be at full strength until at least after the buy.

Luckily, the Panthers are in good position to weather that storm. they have like a billion nfl starting caliber linebackers.

I predict a second half defensive surge for the Panthers, with the coaches smartly rotating Beason and Davis in and out depending on situations.

If the team performs well in the first half, and can just tread water, the defense will surge in november, and have healthy difference makers heading into the playoffs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jtnc Newbie

jtnc

Posted
Posted

So if Beason and Davis aren't going to play for much of the year what's the starting lineup looking like?

Anderson-Kuechly-????

He never said they wouldn't play, he pretty much said we won't see a impact out of them till they get into the swing of things. And their bodies adjust to the game again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
frash.exe Apprentice

frash.exe

Posted
Posted

He had tendonitis in his achilles last summer, had a minor procedure done before the season began and then blew it out in the opener.

http://www.rotoworld.com/recent/nfl/4192/jon-beason

...It used to be an achilles tear was basically career-ending, however today any player as fit as Beason can come back strong. But it's still one of the most devastating injuries in a football sense and it still takes more than a year before you can even get back to playing speed, let alone back to prior form. I don't know if we'll see the old Beason at any point this season and I'm sure he won't look anything like his former self until at least around midpoint. At least we've got Luke to contribute at the LB position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted

I remember that 49er season changing game. Fox made a halftime adjustment. It stood out since they were so rare....got aggressive on D. Started to blitz heavily. Was a nice moment. He kept that mindset to finish that season

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • electro's horse
      Dave Tepper gives Canales and Dan Morgan vote of confidence

      By electro's horse · Posted

      If Canales has helped Bryce a “poo ton” and this is what we have then what’s the fuging point? And the offense wasn’t humming with Dalton in there either, except against the raiders who’ll likely be firing their coach after this season.  XL is probably the fourth best looking receiving option on the team right now behind thielen, Coker, and sanders. I don’t think anyone would disagree with that. Who cares about total receiving yards when everyone else has missed time and there’s like 180 yards of receiving a game.  and lmao they were “believing” shut the fug up. They lost and for the most part those games were all the defense shutting down the other team. The chiefs turned around and gave up an actual impressive stat line to Aiden O’Connell and I not even the most delusional raiders fans think that means anything. Bryce did nothing against the eagles, the Bucs are a mash unit, and any one of us could have done that Bryce did against the giants and saints.  And as far as who they’d get, they didn’t have any trouble hiring the guy you’re tripping over yourself to defend. They also could have hired Dan Quinn, who’s actually succeeding with a young qb.  And people are acting like the risk of getting paid for not working for five years is a negative. Canales is going to spend the next half a decade getting paid to watch porn in his Bible camp office.
    • Super Grateful
      Has this game changed feelings about Young?

      By Super Grateful · Posted

      the Dallas game definitely quelled the hype. his biggest issue will always be his size, and that shows when he gets sacked. he's simply not big or strong enough to protect the ball. even in the KC game, he fumbled it on a basic sack and thank god icky landed on it. INT's are going to happen, most fans don't understand that tipped balls and wrong routes account for most interceptions. but the wet-bar-of-soap type fumbles upon contact are a huge reg flag. the common theme with players like Darnold and Mayfield who previously played for us and are now excelling makes me want to practice patience more when it comes to the QB position. I think Bryce bought himself another season, perhaps with more weapons. I do like the idea of adding a QB whether that's a FA or mid round rookie. if the same mistakes occur next season and we see no further growth or most importantly, wins, then it will be time to move on. just a quick reminder though, football is not an individual sport. QB is just one position, albeit the most important. 
    • mav1234
      Dave Tepper gives Canales and Dan Morgan vote of confidence

      By mav1234 · Posted

      There's some big assumptions in here - first, I think Canales HAS helped Bryce a poo ton. To pretend he hasn't is asinine. Has he fixed him?  I mean, the dude looks like he could perhaps be a backup or low-end starter now, whereas he looked like he didn't belong in the NFL a year ago. You're talking about a coach that brought one of the worst NFL QBs of all time to a point where he may actually be a low-end starter. That IS impressive. Second, the bolded. Come on - given the offense, the dude is far from "trending towards bust." He definitely needs work but he's shown an impressive ability to get open. He's contributing to an anemic offense. The dude is our leading receiver (though he'll be #2 in yardage by end of season by a little, as Thielen does better per game).  As to his coaching, he had this team competing and believing against 3 of the better teams in the NFL, despite the lack of talent, and despite our QB situation.  Yes, things fell apart vs DAL, and he was outcoached. But that will happen with young coaches IMO.  I don't think it indicates he cant' be better. The idea of "pulling off the bandage" is ridiculous. Who would want to coach here if we fired this guy after one season? 
×
×
  • Create New...