Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Breaking down Jonathan Stewart's deal

jtnc

By jtnc,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

panther4life Community Regular

panther4life

Posted
Posted

Ok let's go down the list of every single team you put down then, because coming up with 17 teams that you can conclusively say we're more talented than in like 5 minutes is amateur.

Would you rather make yourself look like an absolute fool who doesn't know when to shut his mouth and accept the fact that he got challenged to elaborate on something of which he was bullshitting about? You've got Hurney's black and blue dildo lodged so far up your ass you can't even name all of the Cowboys' better-known players (let alone role-playing contributors), including one who's been entrenched in trade talks and one who was one of the best rookies last year, on the Cowboys, the team whose name you can't go 20 seconds without hearing on ESPN.

Go ahead, smart guy, next tell us how we're more talented than the Jets.

"uhh okay, um secondary is a push, um because we've got gamble and they've got revis...."

I would continue to play this game with you but your biggest weaponry in your arguments is this internet tough guy bullshit. Think about that, while I ignore you from this point forward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
frash.exe Apprentice

frash.exe

Posted
Posted

I would continue to play this game with you but your biggest weaponry in your arguments is this internet tough guy bullshit. Think about that, while I ignore you from this point forward.

Great explanation. So I guess we can say this obvious ridiculous half-cocked claim of us having more talent than the majority of the league has been debunked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
pantherclaw Grand Master

pantherclaw

Posted
Posted

I see you're still butthurt over last night. I figured a man who has no insecurities, would have moved on.

It also helps to know who are talking about. I'd never hit a woman or child. Maybe you're talking about yourself.

Go ahead, get mad again, throw more insults around.

You're good at that for being such an arrogant man. Lol

G'nite.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Stroupe-a-loop Newbie

Stroupe-a-loop

Posted
Posted

Ok let's go down the list of every single team you put down then, because coming up with 17 teams that you can conclusively say we're more talented than in like 5 minutes is amateur.

Hey friend, I hate to break it to you, but everybody posting on this board is an amateur. Including yourself. The whole acting like a dick thing doesn't make you a professional sports writer, though I guess it does give you something in common with a number of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
megadeth078 Newbie

megadeth078

Posted
Posted

Oh great, good to know our resident oppressive franchise sycophant has checked into this thread.

How'd the last few days treat you since you got all butthurt the last time I owned you in a debate, pantherclaw?

If you owned him in a debate, why are you the one that's butthurt?

I think you're doing it wrong, bro.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rayzor Grand Master

rayzor

Posted
Posted

I think when talking passing rushing percentages you have to discuss teams by scheme. For example New Orleans Philly, and Green Bay are WCOs who short pass as their running game. Their 2 and 3 yard dumpoffs are simply extended handoffs which are more like a pitch or run than a true pass. So they tend to inflate the ratios. but even with that said, the Saints** passed 59% of the time. And that appears to be the upper end for teams. So while it is true that most teams pass more than they run, it isn't as if teams can simply pass without developing a good running game unless they want to be susceptible to being one dimensional which is one of the reasons the Patriots have not won the Superbowl despite being in it two times recently. They are susceptible to teams with good pass rushes.

And for those saying that defense wins Super bowls not offense, two of the last 3 winners had much better offenses than defenses. But I digress.

The Panthers are going to run a spread scheme this year focusing on the run option. They are rather unique in that no other team runs this scheme as much as we do so honestly I don't know why we want to emulate a WCO offense or focus on the passing game to the exclusion of the running game which is our bread and butter. And for those who say we are killing our pass defense by spending too much on the running game, we will be spending around 11,000,000 which is less than 10% of our cap on double trouble in 2013. This is less than the 13,000,000 cap hit for Charles Johnson alone in 2013 which is as it should be given that DEs get the big bucks.

How do we compare running versus passing? Last year we passed 52% of the time. So the difference between a passing team like New Orleans and a big time running team like the Panthers is roughly 8% or 6-8 more passes a game. That isn't that different really. Maybe 1 more pass per drive or conversely 1 more run. Nor is the money committed to the running game between the two. New Orleans has committed around 9 million to the running game in 2012 which is about 2 million less than we have committed. Hard to see what all the fuss it about.

good info on the contract numbers.

i've looked at the the real differences between so called passing teams and so called running teams and except for a couple extremes on either end there really isn't a big difference between the two. people make too big of a fuss about this being a passing league. sure, it leans to the pass a bit more but it's not that extreme...coming from a fox team it is, but for the rest of the league it really isn't. i found the same thing you found...it's only a matter of an extra passing play or two a game.

the league isn't abandoning the running game or putting it on a back burner as much as people make it out to be. that's more media hype. teams are passing more than they have, but not drastically. you can look at rankings for who ran more or less and it looks like there is a big disparity between them, but when you look at the actual numbers per game, there just isn't the big spread the rankings would have you think.

we don't run all that more than most teams in the league, we just run better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Rubi Experienced

Rubi

Posted
Posted

good info on the contract numbers.

i've looked at the the real differences between so called passing teams and so called running teams and except for a couple extremes on either end there really isn't a big difference between the two. people make too big of a fuss about this being a passing league. sure, it leans to the pass a bit more but it's not that extreme...coming from a fox team it is, but for the rest of the league it really isn't. i found the same thing you found...it's only a matter of an extra passing play or two a game.

the league isn't abandoning the running game or putting it on a back burner as much as people make it out to be. that's more media hype. teams are passing more than they have, but not drastically. you can look at rankings for who ran more or less and it looks like there is a big disparity between them, but when you look at the actual numbers per game, there just isn't the big spread the rankings would have you think.

we don't run all that more than most teams in the league, we just run better.

This is why I have no problem extending DWill and Stew. It doesn't matter that they play running back. What matters is that they are important parts to how we play offense...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...