Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Pete Prisco weighs in on Stews signing.


Kurb

Recommended Posts

Seriously when you say things like this you essentially are saying you think that you are smarter than Chud and know better what we should be doing than he is doing. Otherwise why do you think we drafted a road grader like Silatolu in the second. You think Chud had nothing to do with that. We have a great offensive coordinator who is getting the players he thinks he needs to run his offense. Unless you are going to act like you know more about offense than he does, it is hard to take your opinion very seriously.

Our line was ranked 5th in run blocking and 20th in pass blocking last year but the pass blocking numbers were totally based on sacks which are going to be high because like Ben for Pittsburgh, Cam tends to hold the ball too long always thinking he can run his way out of trouble.

I wish CRA had an opportunity to interview Hurney, Rivera, and Chud... I'd love to hear him question their motives and then get schooled.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Butbutbutbut... If teams are all suiting up to the play the pass with smaller safeties, linebackers and pass rushers then shouldn't the Panthers attack be sitting pretty?

Jeeze Pete, the absence of a running game was why they were successful? You're sure it wasn't Peyton Manning, Eli, Brady, or Kurt Warner? fugin' moron. You know what all those QBs really like? A runningback that can catch well and pound the clock at the end of games. Teams make runs and get to the SB sometimes because they have hot QBs, not because they don't have a dominant run game.

It's not like this Panthers offense is similar to any other offense. It's just not possible. Our runningbacks are extremely active in the passing game.

Not to mention Stewart will be restructured. We all know it's coming, and if I had to guess when, I'd say it'll happen in around two years when we extend Cam's contract. How many times have you heard: "Player X restructured and it helped sign Player Y"

Tolbert already took a paycut to play with Cam, I'm sure we'll get lots of discounts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seriously when you say things like this you essentially are saying you think that you are smarter than Chud and know better what we should be doing than he is doing. Otherwise why do you think we drafted a road grader like Silatolu in the second. You think Chud had nothing to do with that. We have a great offensive coordinator who is getting the players he thinks he needs to run his offense. Unless you are going to act like you know more about offense than he does, it is hard to take your opinion very seriously.

Our line was ranked 5th in run blocking and 20th in pass blocking last year but the pass blocking numbers were totally based on sacks which are going to be high because like Ben for Pittsburgh, Cam tends to hold the ball too long always thinking he can run his way out of trouble.

I am not the one claiming Chud is going to run the wishbone and become a run oriented OC. Those arguing suddenly we are going to go back to the days off being a RB focused team are the ones contradicting what Chud/Norv have always been about.

We took a big step last year in getting away from being RB driven and being QB driven. I agreed 100% with that....and expect Chud to CONTINUE to do so. We will run. It is part of his offense functioning. The days of this offense being about Double Trouble ended when Cam AND Chud arrived IMO.

I think Silalotu has a diverse and high upside....and Hurney/Rivers likely drafted him for that reason. Not some idea that Chud is thinking screw these rules that setup my passing offense....we are going old school smash mouth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wish CRA had an opportunity to interview Hurney, Rivera, and Chud... I'd love to hear him question their motives and then get schooled.

Yeah, they made the offense all about Newton last year....which is what I love. Which a reasonable person could assume it will be again this year. Why wouldn't the offense be built around and through the guy with a ceiling potentially higher than any QB in NFL history. I wouldn't be the knucklehead asking Chud if he was going to run the wishbone 80 times this year bc I think it would be unstoppable and that we should unlike last year focus on run, run, run the RBs.

I would assume though that Rivera/Chud dont have much to assume with the contracts. Hurney has been overpaying guys long before they arrived.

You guys are predicting things that contradict what we saw last year....not me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We'll see what happens but let's be realistic.

With our poor defensive line, anemic pass rush, and generally shoddy secondary, it's possible the score could be 21-7 quickly...in several games. That's when you need receivers, not running backs.

Prisco says he respects Hurney but then disses him for this move.

The issue that Prisco ignores is that we can pass as well as run. It isn't like we ran for 2400 yards and only passed for 2500 more. We had the thirteenth most passing yards to go along with our 3rd most rushing yards. It wasn't as if our offense didn't work or needed to be revamped. Why would we change anything when we had the 7th best offense in the league with a rookie at the helm. And when you look at yards per play we were 4th in the league.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not the one claiming Chud is going to run the wishbone and become a run oriented OC. Those arguing suddenly we are going to go back to the days off being a RB focused team are the ones contradicting what Chud/Norv have always been about.

We took a big step last year in getting away from being RB driven and being QB driven. I agreed 100% with that....and expect Chud to CONTINUE to do so. We will run. It is part of his offense functioning. The days of this offense being about Double Trouble ended when Cam AND Chud arrived IMO.

I think Silalotu has a diverse and high upside....and Hurney/Rivers likely drafted him for that reason. Not some idea that Chud is thinking screw these rules that setup my passing offense....we are going old school smash mouth.

So if this offense is not about double trouble then why did we just sign Stewart yesterday instead of trading him or letting him leave in free agency.

And there were lots of guys we could have drafted if we didn't want a big nasty run blocking guard. Hurney has repeatedly said he likes that Silatolu is nasty and brings an aggressive and tough attitude to the position. Plus Rivera has said he wants the offense to be aggressive and dictate to the defense not the other way around.

That sounds smashmouthed to me. I think you are wrong again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our line was ranked 5th in run blocking and 20th in pass blocking last year but the pass blocking numbers were totally based on sacks which are going to be high because like Ben for Pittsburgh, Cam tends to hold the ball too long always thinking he can run his way out of trouble.

And what impact do you think Cam's nontraditional running had on that run blocking ranking? The running that allowed him to convert more 3rd downs than any runner in the NFL, 2nd most TDs in the NFL by any runner, and 30% of our yardage. I fully expect Cam to continue to do what he has always done......no point drafting the kid if you don't. Chud seemed to let Cam be Cam...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't see why people are getting so upset about his opinion of Stewart's extension. I don't necessarily agree with him, but I definitely thought he brought up an interesting argument. I LOVE Stew and what he brings and the way he plays.

The real question is, does anyone think that investing all of this money in the RB position will hinder us from signing players that we think can improve other weaknesses on our team? (We have needed better D Linemen for awhile now...) We want to build a team that is balanced across the board... and the salary cap plays a part in how you can do that.

I also thought it was interesting how he pointed out that the powerhouses in the league the past few years (Giants, Packers, Patriots, Saints*, etc..) have ranked pretty low in the run game or have put much more emphasis on the pass than the run. Its a good point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So if this offense is not about double trouble then why did we just sign Stewart yesterday instead of trading him or letting him leave in free agency.

And there were lots of guys we could have drafted if we didn't want a big nasty run blocking guard. Hurney has repeatedly said he likes that Silatolu is nasty and brings an aggressive and tough attitude to the position. Plus Rivera has said he wants the offense to be aggressive and dictate to the defense not the other way around.

That sounds smashmouthed to me. I think you are wrong again.

Why did Hurney help make the Clev backup QB the hight paid QB in the NFL in 2010? Why did Hurney attempt to make Peppers coming off a 2 sack season and clearly not wanting to be here the highest paid defender in the NFL? I don't know why Hurney does what he does...but I assume you do.

and no, the offense wasn't about Double Trouble last year. It was about Cam, the future of our franchise.....yet now we are going to take two steps back? I mean the first year of Williams' big contract he gained 79 more yards than the 2007 season you were laughing at and how little production he had in that other thread.

Nothing Chud has done suggests going back to Foxball logic. The Cam Newton era has begun.....I, for one, love it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And what impact do you think Cam's nontraditional running had on that run blocking ranking? The running that allowed him to convert more 3rd downs than any runner in the NFL, 2nd most TDs in the NFL by any runner, and 30% of our yardage. I fully expect Cam to continue to do what he has always done......no point drafting the kid if you don't. Chud seemed to let Cam be Cam...

On run blocking it was positive but on pass blocking it was a mixed bag. His ability to evade the rush likely avoided a number of sacks but he also ran round and held the ball sometimes for forever. If you look at the 2 sacks he took last night, one was due to a blitz that wasn't picked up but the other was due to him holding onto the ball too long.

But I am the one saying we need to run and use double trouble and do what works. You are the one wanting to dismantle the run game and get rid of the run blockers in favor of pass blockers. Or is this another flip flop??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On run blocking it was positive but on pass blocking it was a mixed bag. His ability to evade the rush likely avoided a number of sacks but he also ran round and held the ball sometimes for forever. If you look at the 2 sacks he took last night, one was due to a blitz that wasn't picked up but the other was due to him holding onto the ball too long.

But I am the one saying we need to run and use double trouble and do what works. You are the one wanting to dismantle the run game and get rid of the run blockers in favor or pass blockers. Or is this another flip flop??

How have I suggested we dismantle our run game? by suggesting Newton and half Double Trouble gives us the potential to have the best rushing attack in the NFL?

I have no issues with the OL outside of Bell. They are a good mix. Bell is a run blocking RT. Doesnt have the athletic ability IMO to handle speed on the outside. Our Ts need to be more than run blockers in our new scheme. Our rookie was nasty in the run game in college but has the talent to be more that. I have several times gone on record that this draft class has me more excited than any collective one I can recall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hang in there, my friend.  I think Tepper has learned he needs to be hands off the football operations.  I'm anxious to see what we do the rest of the season.  Have faith.
    • 》Product Name — Denticore 》Category — Oral Health Supplement 》Availability — Official Website 》Main Benefits — Supports Oral Health, Support Teeth And Gum Health. 》Side Effects — N/A 》Rating — ★★★★✰ 4.8/5 》Official Website — https://www.globalfitnessmart.com/order-denticore If you’re considering adding a dental supplement to your routine, you might be wondering whether DentiCore is worth your investment. Packed with ingredients like calcium and chlorella vulgaris, it claims to boost your oral health in various ways. While users report benefits such as fresher breath and reduced gum bleeding, it’s important to evaluate how it fits into your overall dental care. So, does the price tag of $69 justify the promises? Let’s explore the details that might help you make an informed decision. Click Here To Visit DentiCore Official Website Click Here To Visit DentiCore Official Website Click Here To Visit DentiCore Official Website DentiCore Price and Packages The price for DentiCore is: Buy 1 Bottle (30 Day Supply): $69. Buy 3 Bottles (90 Day Supply): $59/bottle Buy 6 Bottles (180 Day Supply): $49/bottle + 2 Free Ebooks Limited Time Special Pricing - Act Now! Secure Your Reserved Denticore While Stocks Last DentiCore Bonuses Bonus #1: Fresh Breath 24/7. Bonus #2: The Healthiest Smile. Final Verdict: DentiCore Reviews Based on the detailed analysis, DentiCore pills seem to be an effective oral hygiene support that helps people get healthy teeth and gums. The powerful blend of natural ingredients that are scientifically backed also enhances the respiratory function of a person. DentiCore reviews from customers indicate that they enjoy the formula and haven’t reported any side effects from its usage. Now coming to other aspects of the supplement, it’s a 100% natural and vegetarian formulation that is manufactured under strict and precise standards in an FDA-approved facility. This ensures its safety and quality. On top of all, the manufacturers offer a 60-day 100% money-back guarantee, making it a risk-free investment. So, considering all the above-mentioned factors, I would like to say DentiCore dental care supplement is worth trying. For The Best Prices And Offers, Visit The Official Website And See Why Denticore Works.
    • i felt good for those few games that bryce didn't look like the worst in the league. all that fell apart again sunday.  i'm borderline just bailing on it all. i've been hanging on by a thin thread for several years. i mean it's not even fun to watch any football right now. 
×
×
  • Create New...