Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Best available Defensive ends, Cornerbacks and Defensive tackles in F.A.


panther4life

Recommended Posts

That we did not sign because of the money spent on running backs?

Why beat this dead horse? Well because several others are and I am trying to understand why they are up in arms over it.

*I just want to point out that Hurney has never committed more than 6 million a year to an outside free agent(and he's only given up that much once), well before Deangelo and Stewart signed their contracts.

** We also have 8 million free right now

and then finally a bonus question...whats the most money we have commited to Deangelo and Stewart in a single season(cap hit)?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly man, Kearse and Edwards should be the starters at DT.

At CB, Captain shouldn't be a starter obviously and if Norman, Hogan, or Butler could step in, that would make a significant difference in our pass defense.

LB corps is probably the best in the league if they can stay healthy. Sure, they could've brought in some competition at CB and DT, but there are capable guys on the roster. Safety should be somewhat better with Nakamura in there, but Godfrey still hasn't proven to be a consistent performer, so we'll see there.

I like what we have, I just think it comes down to playing the right guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread really is about beating a dead horse. I am thinking that perhaps this is beating around the bush, or trolling for something. I'll just put it out there and throw you're your bone (pointless as it is):

Asante Samuel

BTW, it's irrespective of investing in RBs, because we could have had Samuel regardless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We are no longer a defensive team.

We are interested in outscoring other teams with the defense helping a bit here and there.

We are not interested in trying to allow under 14 points a game.

Could very well be true.

Defense might take a turn towards takeaways more than anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread really is about beating a dead horse. I am thinking that perhaps this is beating around the bush, or trolling for something. I'll just put it out there and throw you're your bone (pointless as it is):

Asante Samuel

BTW, it's irrespective of investing in RBs, because we could have had Samuel regardless.

I 100% agree and have stated numerous times that we should've went after Samuel. Pairing him with Gamble would've been huge for us. Getting him for a 7th rounder would've been even better, but as you pointed out.....this is a mute point.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who was the last Superbowl winning team that had a better defense than offense?

Just off the top of my head, I don't remember any... Almost all of the recent championship teams had turnover-creating defenses that weren't necessarily top ranked.

Look at all the great defenses that fell short because the defense was better than the offense (Ravens, Jets, etc.).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I am i Asia and have to download games, the version that first came out was a Texans broadcast.

And as annoying as it was, one comment kept coming from the commentator.

Preseason this or that aside i felt his comment was spot on.

In referring to the openness of Texan receivers in our secondary, and in a few places the running game, I kept hearing " like smoke through a keyhole"

I wont make any statements about FA's or current players, but I will say that even with the first team defense our keyhole was almost as large as the entire door..and I hope this is something that gets corrected damn quick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...