Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Legal question. Rental Car Company.

Kettle

By Kettle,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

Kettle Newbie

Kettle

Posted
Posted

Long story short I hit a rental car. The damages were minimal, and my insurance took care of them. What they didn't take care of though were some fees that the rental company is now asking me to pay out of pocket. Administration, loss of use, and loss of value total up to ~$420. The insurance company does not pay these things because there is no quantifiable proof behind them.

If I don't pay, what sort of action or consequence can I expect? The rental representative has not returned my call.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Kettle Newbie

Kettle

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I said that in a nice way on the voice mail I left. I told them it seemed like they were just trying to squeeze some extra cash out of me. I'm hoping they'll leave me alone now that I have called, but I don't expect them to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Darth Biscuit Mentor

Darth Biscuit

Posted
Posted

Everything I see online in regards to this is for when you rent a car from a rental company, not when you're at fault in an accident. I don't see that they have much to stand on in this case, because you're not the one who signed the rental contract.... but I would ask someone else, and if they don't contact you about it fug 'em. Only issue is if they turn it over to collections... but I really don't see how they can.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
panther4life Community Regular

panther4life

Posted
Posted

Fug them what can they do? You didn't rent the car nor do they have anything with you social so they can't ding your credit.

They are not going to get a lawyer over 420 bucks of frivolous charges. Do us all a favor and tell its what shitttyass company it is so we can avoid using them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Doyle Collaborator

Doyle

Posted
Posted

I contacted my insurance before calling the rental company and they could offer no advice as it is not their specialty. Enterprise is the company.

My first instinct would be to make my insurance company deal with it. That is why you pay them every month. I'm not saying they should pay it they should just handle it for you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • mav1234
      BREAKING: Panthers Announce Four Moves Including LB Trevin Wallace To IR

      By mav1234 · Posted

      I'd give it a C mainly because of Brooks.  If we just didn't have a 2nd I'd argue B to B+ tbh. Brooks was a bad gamble, tho one that could still pay off long term. Yes XL only has 400 yards but... Look who is throwing him the ball. And I think he isn't a "true #1" but he's been able to consistently get open. Hands definitely need to be cleaned up.  But he should end the year with 500-600 yards. Like you said - Sanders looks great.  Get him a better QB / more time with a QB and I think he's gonna impress. We added a couple rotational players on D that have both made plays and show promise for the future from later rounds. So I'd say, Brooks really hurts this drafts grade. It'll be interesting to see how it progresses over the next 3 years. I've overall really liked Morgan's FA acquisitions, so...
    • Gapanthersfan
      Would you trade Ickey

      By Gapanthersfan · Posted

      Oh he would absolutely flourish. It’s the panthers way. It’s no different with coaches. Sometimes they reach their expiration date, go somewhere else, and find new success.  Similarly to Burns, how long to wait for the light to finally turn on?  Market forces will demand a salary that the panthers can not responsibly match. Sliding him to guard will fit his skill set better, but he has played LT for 3 years. He will receive offers from other teams wanting to pay him LT money.  At guard, he won’t start with what they have paid Hunt and Lewis. Center then?? Dunno. Maybe? He will become a backup by default once they draft their stud LT. I doubt Dan just stands pat. That’s not his MO.  So where does this put him? Can you match what other teams will offer for a backup LT/guard? Do you dish out franchise LT $ on a guy who still needs significant improvement in pass protection. This team will be DOA in the playoffs with the very first team who has a formidable speed rusher. What if he has hit his ceiling in pass protection already and they sign him long term? It’s a big gamble either way. 
    • travisura
      Cousins benched in Atlanta

      By travisura · Posted

      We're in a great position to see just how big of a misstep it would be, having made so many ourselves
×
×
  • Create New...