Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Matt Moore verging on losing his job to another rookie and/or black QB


frash.exe

Recommended Posts

Word out of Miami is that Tannehill's got a good chance of securing the no.2 spot, and consistent overachiever David Garrard (from Jersey) is battling it out for the no.1 spot with the the NFL's paragon of mediocrity at the QB position and favorite signal caller among white guys who live in trailers, Matt Moore. The loser of this battle is speculated to be "expendable"

And while the feeling is that Garrard is the odds-on favorite to win the starting job, Moore is doing... other things with his reps...

"4th down, 18 yards to go -- Matt Moore spikes the ball. (Can't believe he did that on fourth down.)"

*Facepalm*

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Matt Moore is far from talent-less.

Everyone thinks that their back up quarterback needs to be able to get them to the the Super Bowl and that's just not going to happen.

Moore would be a great back up for Cam albeit they don't compare very well skill wise and I'd much rather have Jason Campbell, Troy Smith, Tarvaris Jackson, or Vince Young but that's beside the point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"To be honest, if the Fins let go of Moore, I'd like to have him back to back up Cam."

"Moore would be a great back up for Cam albeit they don't compare very well skill wise."

"Moore has chemistry with smith, lafell, gettis and threw some nice passes to them in his time here."

These comments are not Smitty approved!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Spoken like someone who hasn't watched nearly enough of T-Mac other than a few short highlight clips to know his game. The only thing he doesn't have is the short area quickness in the way that you're looking for, as you seem to want that Jefferson/Chase type of WR, which sure, he's not that. But him and XL are nothing alike, let alone having the same strengths and weaknesses.  In particular, T-Mac's #1 strength is LITERALLY XL's #1 weakness, their hands.  T-Mac has vice grips for hands, catches darn near everything, and does it all with hands catches, the opposite of XL.   Beyond that, you mention prioritizing route running, of which, T-Mac already runs a complete NFL route tree at a high level.  Yes, he needs to work on his get off the line at the snap and get a little crisper on some of his cuts to create separation, but again, all players need to work on something, that's just what his is.  It doesn't change that he is already a great route runner, there are just some small elements of it that he can improve on. Even then, it's like I've been saying, the trade off of not having that true elite separation like the smaller WR's get, is how good he is at using his body to keep the DB's from being able to break up passes and just making contested catches in general.  You lose a little bit of separation, but his 6'5" body gives him advantages that the smaller WRs just don't have. Again, your post here insinuates that T-Mac is a slow, plodding big WR who isn't a proficient route runner, which couldn't be further from the truth.  I have no issue with people wanting other players over T-Mac, or just not wanting him at all.  But they need to be logical reasons, not made up ones in your head because you don't actually know the player and his abilities.
    • I'm pretty sure that was the best season he's ever gonna have.  
    • I swear that hire continues to make zero sense to me, but im all for it
×
×
  • Create New...