Multiple dead in TDKR showing

[-13 Amp-]

Unless you were friggin Braveheart you are not killing 30 people with a broadsword

you can still burn the place down and kill everybody in it...theres many many ways to kill people that dont include guns

[CRA]

We should just give people rocket launchers. So what if it'll help kill massive amounts of people. Without them, people would still stab each other with knives even though the number of people getting stabbed would be much lower!

The outrage people are experiencing today would still exist if a guy took a butcher knife and randomly killed an innocent person.....and it made the full news cycle with details.

People will always find means to act out in violence....and I have yet to hear you give a suggestion to go WITH gun restrictions to tackle the problem.

[Panthro]

you can still burn the place down and kill everybody in it...theres many many ways to kill people that dont include guns

But he didn't burn it down.

[-13 Amp-]

because he chose a different way...doesn't make it not true

[PhillyB]

I think if you want a gun it should be a muzzleloader.

Go kill 20 people with a musket. I mean that is the gun that was around in 1776....not an AR-15

RIGHTZ TO BEARS ARM!!!!!

this is an intriguing point. i've never given real pause to the technological context of the right to bear arms. i wonder how the founding fathers would've decided on such an issue if arms had the capability to kill scores (or hundreds [or thousands]) of people in moments.

[Panthro]

Where are your statistics?

[Panthro]

this is an intriguing point. i've never given real pause to the technological context of the right to bear arms. i wonder how the founding fathers would've decided on such an issue if arms had the capability to kill scores (or hundreds [or thousands]) of people in moments.

Every once in a while I stumble onto one.

[CRA]

But he didn't burn it down.

Gun was just his selected method....point clearly was he was choosing to act out in violence.

As another poster pointed out, taking away guns would decrease emotional and unplanned moments of violence bc of the ease of use.....as far as the crazy planners go....it just makes them less efficient.

Which is why the anti gun crowd needs more to there argument....

[CRA]

this is an intriguing point. i've never given real pause to the technological context of the right to bear arms. i wonder how the founding fathers would've decided on such an issue if arms had the capability to kill scores (or hundreds [or thousands]) of people in moments.

Right to bear arms doesn't include WMDs and missiles....people don't have the right to such things

[Guest Irv]

Looks like you guys are getting added to my crazy white people watch of 2012

[Panthro]

Gun was just his selected method....point clearly was he was choosing to act out in violence.

As another poster pointed out, taking away guns would decrease emotional and unplanned moments of violence bc of the ease of use.....as far as the crazy planners go....it just makes them less efficient.

Which is why the anti gun crowd needs more to there argument....

Show me a place where there is stricter gun laws but higher incidents of Arson than the united states.

Clearly there has to be a correlation and can be proven

But there isn't. Homicides happen at an equal amount when you remove guns.

[CRA]

Panthro...do you believe you should have the right to bear arms?

[Panthro]

Panthro...do you believe you should have the right to bear arms?

Yes

we should all have muskets

(I own a rifle)

[KendrickPanther]

worst thread ever. totally derailed the important issues of this issue.