Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why Have the Panthers Historically Done So Bad in Week 1?


Seltzer

Recommended Posts

So I was thinking about the Week 1 game against Tampa, which I think is a must win if the Panthers are going to make the Playoffs this year. I do think it is winnable game, but there is something about Week 1 that is scary to any long-time Panther fan.

First off, out of 17 seasons, the Panthers have only won 6 times (1996,2001,2002,2003,2007,2008) for a winning percentage of ~35%. That certainly is a bad number. A very bad number really, and a real bummer to start the season (and usually a bad omen).

Of the Panthers 4 playoff appearances (1996,2003,2005,2008), only 1 time did they make the playoffs when they didn't win Week 1. Conversely, from a historcal perspective, a win in Week 1 usually means a good season.

Capers only won the opener 1 of 4 times. Seifert won 1 of out 3 (however, his team went on to lose 15 straight).

Fox won 4 out of 9 (44% percent), which is closer to the all-time winning percentage of the Panthers 131-150 (~47%) and closer to the 50% overall winning percentage Fox had overall.

Fox, despite his flaws, is obviously the best coach the Panthers have had up until this point, although I am hopeful Rivera will surpass him. And I think it is undisputable Fox's best work came early in his tenure and it was well past time for both sides to move on before the trainwreck of 2010.

Anyway, back to the present, I think Week 1 is a HUGE game for Rivera as a coach, and the Panthers as a team. As Fox used to say, "They're all big" but I do think the opening game against Tampa is going to set the tone for what kind of season the Panthers will have but it may also speak volumes about Rivera long term as a coach.

I certainly give Rivera a pass for last year Week 1 as the Panthers put up a great effort despite little time to prepare against the Cardinals on the road with Newton making his first start and Rivera his first game as HC. However, the Panthers should have the advantage this year in terms of preparation having a full off-season and continuity on the coaching staff versus a Tampa team with new coaches and more question marks.

That being said, I don't think Tampa will be a pushover by any means and there is considerable talent on their team, especially on offense. Still, this is a game I expect the Panthers to win.

It certainly would be a great way to start the season considering the many blunders of Week 1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The panthers always seem to stumble in the opener. I didn't realize that we had only won six out of our seventeen openers. That is a pretty pathetic stat.

Week one is a statement game this year. They need to come out and hang 30+ on the Bucs while the defense holds them to around 14.

That would be a nice jumpstart to the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Becuase the team has only had 4 winning seasons in 17 years with one .500 season. They just haven't been good.

True. But 35% vs. 47% overall is still statistically a significant drop. I'm sure it eats at Richardson as it does the rest of us b/c it implies a lack of preparation for Week 1, when you would think there should be no excuse for a lack of preparation (last year notwithstanding).

Other than the playoff losses, losing in Week 1 is about as deflating as a loss can be. I am hopeful the trend will be reversed with Cam/Rivera.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think trying to draw any kind of meaningful conclusions from data that is as broad as the starting lineups and coaching staffs on opening day over the last 17 years is a fools errand.

Your point about needing the win is none the less valid. We need to come out strong this year if we want to be anything other than also rans. I don't think this team is mentally strong enough to rally into the playoffs if they start a game or two in the hole.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think trying to draw any kind of meaningful conclusions from data that is as broad as the starting lineups and coaching staffs on opening day over the last 17 years is a fools errand.

Your point about needing the win is none the less valid. We need to come out strong this year if we want to be anything other than also rans. I don't think this team is mentally strong enough to rally into the playoffs if they start a game or two in the hole.

You are right about not drawing any meaningful conclusion as far as common thread as to what is causing the failure. It's more of a theorectical question and just some numbers to look at.

The only meaningful thing is that overall the Panthers have been bad in Week 1 since the beginning regardless of coaching staff, and it sucks for us fans to have such poor showings to start the season.

I just didn't realize how bad until I actually looked it up. Thought it would be interesting to share

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In recent years we have played some teams that matched up well against us. Not really Arizona but Philly and the Giants had great teams. The reality is we have been very mediocre as a franchise.

What I will say is we came ready to play vs. Arizona last year. That is the team that resembles our current team in terms of personnel and coaching. We really played well vs them but we broke down three times on plays of over 40 yards for TDs. Those kind of things happen week 1 with a rookie head coach.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't get the Hunter hate. Just imagine his ceiling if he stopped trying to be this 2way freak and focused on one side of the ball 
    • 100%.  You have to play the cards that are dealt.  Not the cards you wish were dealt.
    • I'd say its definitely going to be addressed this off-season.  We went into the last draft with a roster of RBs including:  Chubba, Blackshear, and Miles Sanders. We picked Jonathan Brooks in the second and still signed Rashaad Penny afterwards.  Fast forward....One turned into a top 10 back, 1 is injured/out for most if not all the '25 season, 1 retired, 1 will either take a huge paycut or be cut, and the last is a restricted free agent. We brought in Mike Boone as well. Add him to the free agent list also.  We need a physical option.    Which qualifies:  Ashton Jeanty(Boise St): Overall ranked Top 10. Almost 2k yards after contact, 28 tds. Would take our first rounder. My money would be on an NFC East team selecting him. (97.2 PFF run grade) - 121 forced missed tackles.  Omarion Hampton(UNC): Ranked everywhere from 20 - 59 overall. Consensus #2 back after Jeanty. He'll be a second rounder. 1,222 Yards after contact w/ 15 tds.  (90.5 PFF run grade) - 72 forced missed Tackles Kaleb Johnson(Iowa): Ranked from 38 - 69 depending on which media outlet you prefer but generally #3. 2nd/3rd possibly. 1,060 Yards after contact w/ 21 tds.(86.7 PFF run grade)- 66 forced missed tackles Cam Skattebo: Ranked from the 50's - 104. Every mock I do he ends up BPA at some point. 969 Yards after contact w/ 17 tds(92 PFF Run Grade). Probably the best receiving back of the group. 81 forced missed tackles.  If the '24 and '25 draft classes were combined, IMO the rankings would be, in order: Jeanty, Hampton, Brooks, Johnson, Skattebo. I wouldn't take one high but I'd take one for Chubba and Brooks insurance. 
×
×
  • Create New...