Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bobcats in Dwight Howard's Trade Talk.


Recommended Posts

Once again, offering Humphries a multi-year deal, ties us down for the long term. I employ you to look past just this year. If we can facilitate a trade that lands us with Humphries on a one year deal to get us to the cap floor as well as land us a first round draft pick, by all means do it. However, paying Humphries $27 million dollars over three years or potentially $36 million dollars over four years puts the Bobcats in a bind for years to come. Don't expect the Bobcats to offer multi-year contracts involving lumps of money when that is exactly what they are trying to get rid of right now.

The goal right now is to shed contracts, while gaining cap relief.

That cap space just gives us relief until a better free agency period comes a long. My guess is Cho is thinking, let's save up a bunch of money that way we can throw more money at better free agents, making them offers they can't refuse.

Here is just a glimpse at the free agent class of 2013...

Atlanta Hawks- Jeff Teague, Josh Smith, Devin Harris, Anthony Morrow

Dallas Mavericks- Shawn Marion

Denver Nuggets- Ty Lawson

Detroit Pistons- Corey Maggette

Golden State Warriors- Stephen Curry, Dorell Wright

Houston Rockets- Kevin Martin

Indiana Pacers- Darren Collison, David West

Los Angeles Clippers- Chris Paul

Los Angeles Lakers- Andrew Bynum

Milwaukee Bucks- Mike Dunleavy, Monta Ellis

Minnesota Timberwolves- Nikola Pekovic

New Orleans Hornets- Jarrett Jack

Oklahoma City Thunder- James Harden

Orlando Magic- Dwight Howard, J.J. Redick, Hedo Turkoglu

Sacramento Kings- Tyreke Evans

San Antonio Spurs- Manu Ginobli

Utah Jazz- Al Jefferson, Paul Millsap, Mo Williams, Marvin Williams

Washington Wizards- Trevor Ariza

Who's some PF or C that is young and we could pick up? I don't see much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I by no means agree with Gilbert's stance when Lebron made The Decision. And even in hindsight, Lebron said he wouldn't have done that whole TV thing for IIRC, but it was pushed by his advisers and agency.

That being said, let's not act like if Lebron was from Charlotte, was drafted by the Cats out of high school, and then decided to leave after 5-7 years of success, that we wouldn't be just as butthurt as Gilbert. That's a bitter pill to swallow but he should've STFU.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Getting Brooks or a pick could be nice, but I don't want to give a long term contract to a guy in Humphries who, at his very best, has been a 10 and 10 player. Good rebounder, but I'm not taking him on for multiple years at a high salary just to get a pick in late twenties.

No way we can land a trade for Brooks. Why do people keeps thinking we can? He's the major piece for a Howard trade.

edit: my bad i mistaken brooks for lopez.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No way we can land a trade for Brooks. Why do people keeps thinking we can? He's the major piece for a Howard trade.

Actually, Brooks is hardly the major piece in the Howard trade; his contract is too small to be.

In the initial trade, the Clippers were slated to land Brooks.

Anyway, the new deal involves the Lakers, Rockets, and Magic.

Magic Receive: Cap Relief

Rockets Receive: Andrew Bynum

Lakers Receive: Dwight Howard

Shitty trade for the Magic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Getting Brooks or a pick could be nice, but I don't want to give a long term contract to a guy in Humphries who, at his very best, has been a 10 and 10 player. Good rebounder, but I'm not taking him on for multiple years at a high salary just to get a pick in late twenties.

No way we can land a trade for Brooks. Why do people keeps thinking we can? He's the major piece for a Howard trade.

Depends o n which "Brooks" you are talking about here

Getting MarShon Brooks is possible. Getting Brook Lopez isn't. I'm thinking carolina-chuck misunderstood which "Brooks" Stroup-a-loop was refering to.

Or maybe I'm the one that's confused :) That's quite possible

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Karlaftis and Danna have been pretty inconsistent so teams have been doubling Jones and able to contain their pass rush.   But the good thing is that yesterday, we schemed well against Steve Spags Defense, Canales married the surrounding personnel with his QB through play designs within his comfort zone and was able to get downfield at will.  He was able to execute higher difficulty throws and look a lot more comfortable.  It tells me that Canales has a good system in mind, and had an edge gameplanning wise against Spagnuolo - which is nice to see.  It's a bit to see-saw at times with either going way too pass heavy or way too run heavy, but I think he's finding out what works.  It takes time to have it come together, and sure, I could see regression happen against a better front-7, but this was good for the entire system gelling.    
    • This was evident first two weeks of season. I don’t see any issues with physical tools since he came back. I think he is a player that must play with confidence to overcome those size limitations and he’s doing that.  
    • Still 3-10 on passes over 15 yards.  At least he's not scared to merely attempt them anymore.  Where I see improvement is the 10-15 yard range.  He was 6-6.  Bryce of old was scatter shot on anything beyond 10 yards and the further out, the worse the accuracy.
×
×
  • Create New...