Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFC South Training Camp Battles


Recommended Posts

Atlanta Falcons (Linebacker): Lofa Tatupu vs. Akeem Dent

New Orleans Saints* (Offensive Line): Charles Brown vs. Zach Strief

Tampa Bay Buccaneers (Running Back): Doug Martin vs. LeGarrette Blount

Carolina Panthers (Linebacker): Thomas Davis vs. James Anderson

CAROLINA PANTHERS

Linebacker: Thomas Davis versus James Anderson

After using the No. 9 pick on Boston College’s Luke Kuechly, it is pretty safe to say the rookie is going to be a starter in Carolina from the get-go. Like stalwart Jon Beason, Kuechly probably can play any of the three starting linebacker spots in the Panthers’ base 4-3 scheme, but he is at his best in the middle.

To ease the rookie’s transition to the NFL, keeping Kuechly at middle linebacker probably makes the most sense when it is all said and done. He just might be the NFL Defensive Rookie of the Year in the middle. If healthy, Beason will start at one of the outside positions and should wear the communication headset in his helmet as an every-down contributor. He, too, is a great player and very versatile.

The issue is with Anderson, a solid and steady linebacker who rarely gets the national credit he deserves, and Davis, who truly has great qualities but has a brutal injury history. If Davis isn’t Davis, this situation is easy: Anderson will play on the strong side and Beason on the weak side. But if Davis looks like his old self in the preseason, he needs to be on the field, which would in turn put Anderson on the bench for much of the time -- which he certainly does not deserve. It will be interesting as to how it shakes out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is something I've struggled with. I don't think its a question of who will benefit the most from playing the Mike it's who will suffer the most by playing the outside. Beason wasn't BEASON when he had to play outside two years ago so I want him in the middle. But at the same time it will help Luke's transition playing in the middle where he's comfortable. I think it'll fall into place with a good balance between Anderson and Davis in one of the outside slots but the real question will be where will Luke and Beason end up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I want to say first, that if Davis had Anderson do his knee the first time, it would have been the only time. So I am going with the mind-set that he should be good to go. What actually happens? Who knows?

With that said. I think Rivera is hoping that all four are healthy, so he can actually run the D he wants. I can see some damm funky looks coming our way this year. My first favorite is a 3-5-3, with the 3 all being a safety. Or even a 3-6-2. Hey, why not?

If you have talent, you have to find a way to get it on the field. We have a pooload of talent at LB, going to have to find a way to get them all on the field. And I feel our S are better than our CB except for Gamble. So getting more LB and S on the field only makes sense. At least to me.

I also think that Rivera is wanting all his top LBs to be able to play all the positions. Interchangable parts mean more variables as to looks and schemes. The more versatility you have, the easier it is to disguise what you plan.

Just a thought or two. And GOOOOOO CATS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The battles I'll be watching will be at CB, safety, and WR. I feel good about our LB corps. If everyone is healthy, we should have 4 legit NFL starting caliber LBs.

I want to see how the secondary battles will play out and I want to see who will earn the right to see the field at WR. We have a lot of young talent in the WR corps and I want to see who is gonna step up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I highly doubt Anderson gets bench. At worst he would be splitting time with Davis.

I want to say first, that if Davis had Anderson do his knee the first time, it would have been the only time. So I am going with the mind-set that he should be good to go. What actually happens? Who knows?

With that said. I think Rivera is hoping that all four are healthy, so he can actually run the D he wants. I can see some damm funky looks coming our way this year. My first favorite is a 3-5-3, with the 3 all being a safety. Or even a 3-6-2. Hey, why not?

If you have talent, you have to find a way to get it on the field. We have a pooload of talent at LB, going to have to find a way to get them all on the field. And I feel our S are better than our CB except for Gamble. So getting more LB and S on the field only makes sense. At least to me.

I also think that Rivera is wanting all his top LBs to be able to play all the positions. Interchangable parts mean more variables as to looks and schemes. The more versatility you have, the easier it is to disguise what you plan.

Just a thought or two. And GOOOOOO CATS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Why would you think we run a 3-5-3 with 3 safeties then say Gamble is better than our safeties? Why wouldn't you keep Gamble on the field?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With that said. I think Rivera is hoping that all four are healthy, so he can actually run the D he wants. I can see some damm funky looks coming our way this year. My first favorite is a 3-5-3, with the 3 all being a safety. Or even a 3-6-2. Hey, why not?

If you have talent, you have to find a way to get it on the field. We have a pooload of talent at LB, going to have to find a way to get them all on the field. And I feel our S are better than our CB except for Gamble. So getting more LB and S on the field only makes sense. At least to me.

cookie_monster_what_the_hell_is_this_crap-s321x311-263104.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With that said. I think Rivera is hoping that all four are healthy, so he can actually run the D he wants. I can see some damm funky looks coming our way this year. My first favorite is a 3-5-3, with the 3 all being a safety. Or even a 3-6-2. Hey, why not?

Not so sure I'm on board with this. I think we have fine outstanding linebackers but our safeties are at borderline poo. That said I agree there is some room for creativity but I don't think we need to get carried away. I think in most cases if you show Drew Brees a 3-6-2 he will show you 6 points and a touchdown dance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm actually starting to think they'll kick Beason outside and put Luke at Mike. Regardless of TD's health I think you have to protect him by limiting his snaps. On short yardage I'd gladly sub TD for S Martin to have an extra sure tackler, thumper on the field.

Me thinks if Davis is 100 percent, then on occasions Luke should line up in Martins spot and Davis play OLB. Not saying make luke a permanent safety, just on occasions because he would help stop the run and offers good pass coverage skills.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm actually starting to think they'll kick Beason outside and put Luke at Mike. Regardless of TD's health I think you have to protect him by limiting his snaps. On short yardage I'd gladly sub TD for S Martin to have an extra sure tackler, thumper on the field.

Me thinks if Davis is 100 percent, then on occasions Luke should line up in Martins spot and Davis play OLB. Not saying make luke a permanent safety, just on occasions because he would help stop the run and offers good pass coverage skills.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I could stomach it for a minute but thought passing the last two drafts when it was deep with even guys like Limmer in later rounds was a pretty big whiff. Never hurts to draft the big uglies, pressing need or not, the guys in the trenches are where to keep the ship afloat.
    • Not sure they made the whole thing up or that Incognito would have a chance in hell suing Martin--when Incognito leaves evidence like this:  ""Hey, wassup, you half-niggxr piece of sh*t. I saw you on Twitter, you been training 10 weeks. I'll sh*t in your fukking mouth. I'm going to slap your fukking mouth, I'm going to slap your real mother across the face [laughter]. Fukk you, you're still a rookie. I'll kill you."   I get the locker room hazing--it is rough at times.  In college, I had to sing in front of the entire team, get Seniors milk in the cafeteria or training table, carry helmets to practice--but it was all 37 freshman, not just me. Eventually, I retaliated (toward the end of the season).  I wrote and sang song about the Seniors that mocked them--I put salt in their milks, etc. But by then, we had bonded.  There was a 6-8, 328 lb player who used to grab me after practice and squeeze me (hard to breath after practice). After our final practice, he threw me into the cold lake beside the practice field. It was never malicious in my mind.  I encouraged it.  HOWEVER, If I heard an upperclassman address one of my freshmen teammates like this, I would have taken some action  on his behalf.  It crosses several lines. I mean, at no time in any situation is it OK to call someone a racial slur, threaten him with physical abuse/assault, threaten his mother with physical violence, and then communicate a death threat.  Humor?  Sarcasm?  No--this was part of a pattern.  If I were Martin, I would not want to stay there after this alone, but if I already wanted an out, Cognito provided it.   My point is not to state who did what and what was made up or not--this alone is criminal. You seem to imply that Incognito was falsely accused. Hard to defend that argument when they have evidence like this. This alone will prevent Incognito from suing anyone.  Do you think a jury or judge would hear this and consider Incognito a victim?  Nope.  I get the impression that Martin did not love football and wanted out, and his heart was not in it.  This became his golden ticket.  Did Incognito increase his motivation for wanting out?   Yes.   there is an 11-year old Hispanic girl who was recently bullied at school.  They called her immigrant and told her that she would be deported because her family is full of rapists and murderers.  She committed suicide--at 11.  Do you think the politicians will accept any responsibility?  This is what THEY were saying.  Do you think the teachers who may have witnessed this and dismissed it as trivial or "kids being kids".  Will the bullies take responsibility?  When you bully, what happens next is on you, and if it backfires, you can't sue.    
    • https://support.google.com/business/thread/326847290?hl=en
×
×
  • Create New...