Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What is the most valuable thing in your life?


Iceberg Slim

Recommended Posts

...in return for what? I mean, c'mon, guys just don't do that sh!t unless they're expecting something in return. And I'm not talking "doing his laundry" either....

Mine does :)

We didn't have a lot of money when we got married..not saying we're rich now by any means...but we do have more now and he wanted me to have a nice big diamond that he wished he could've given me 8 years ago...of course I'm not going to say no to that :) My old ring, I made into a necklace

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would be a tough call between my flushable toilet and electricity.

With electricity comes TV, the fridge, cold beer....you don't know what you got, til its gone.

That flushing toilet is also awesome, but totally unappreciated until you have to crap like a bear for any length of time.

Just sayin'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know- was just playin'

Mine does :)

We didn't have a lot of money when we got married..not saying we're rich now by any means...but we do have more now and he wanted me to have a nice big diamond that he wished he could've given me 8 years ago...of course I'm not going to say no to that :) My old ring, I made into a necklace

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The rules make it tough, Most of the stuff I value isn't material.

Of those things that are, even then the things I prize most are valued because they were gifts from someone I cared about, not because they have any real purpose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd say my house. I've spent thousands of dollars and hundreds of hours improving it and doing things that make it uniquely my own. Both of my kids have murals on their bedroom walls that I spent 20+ hours each on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP
    • When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
×
×
  • Create New...