Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Other franchise players not thrilled with Brees' complaints


Recommended Posts

Other franchise players not thrilled with Brees’ complaints

drew-and-tom-benson-630x420-e1341157742161.jpg?w=229

If the Saints* aren’t treating franchise-tagged quarterback Drew Brees with good faith, then other franchise players could argue that their respective teams have opted to defecate on their respective foreheads.

Len Pasquarelli of the Sports Xchange has gathered quotes from unnamed franchise players and/or their unnamed agents regarding their reaction to Brees’ contention that the Saints’ failure to sign him to a long-term deal traces to his role in last year’s CBA talks.

Said one franchise player: “Nothing against Drew, but he’s kind of become [the union's] fair-haired boy.” The agent for another franchise player said the NFLPA has been treating Brees “like some kind of a Messiah or something.”

As we pointed out recently, the Saints* have offered on multiple occasions long-term deals that would make Brees the highest-paid player in the history of the game. Meanwhile, franchise players like Ravens running back Ray Rice and Bears running back Matt Forte have gotten nowhere, with their teams possibly intent on requiring them to play the 2012 season under the franchise tag.

Other franchise players waiting for long-term deals that may or may not come before the July 16 deadline are Chiefs receiver Dwayne Bowe, Lions defensive end Cliff Avril, Jaguars kicker Josh Scobee, and Broncos kicker Matt Prater.

Lost in Brees’ beef with the Saints* is that the Saints*, like any other team, have the right to squat on the player’s rights under the franchise tag and not sign him to a long-term deal. Although, technically, it would be a violation of the labor deal if the Saints* specifically refuse to sign Brees to a long-term deal because of his union activities, the NFLPA would need pretty strong proof of malicious intent, when the Saints* are otherwise acting fully and completely within their rights.

The good news for Brees is that at least one person — Pasquarelli — is buying the story that Brees had nothing to do with the NFLPA’s effort to claim that the Saints* are trying to stick it to their star quarterback. Pasquarelli may be the only one who falls within that specific category.

http://profootballta...ees-complaints/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The guy is a fake nice-guy, he's the same selfish bastard who held up the CBA negotiations because he wanted to be exempt from the franchise tag, then later said he never did that. Brees is as fake as it gets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My friend camped at William & Mary and said that Brees was a funny guy and down to earth. Now I don't agree with what he's doing, but when he put a Superbowl* in New Orleans he should have command of what he wants. We might not like it, but he has the leverage over the Saints* and in the end will get what he wants. People change their attitudes and typical mannerisms whenever money is involved.

Also, if they overpay him and he declines, then the Saints* are fugged.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My friend camped at William & Mary and said that Brees was a funny guy and down to earth.

Its hilarious how people can draw a conclusion about a person after talking to him for 5 minutes or less. I guess thats why Sandusky has been roaming free for 40 years after he was coaching and molesting kids. Im sure he seemed like "down to earth" guy too.

That being said. . Im kind of glad women do it, and Big Razey is very happy that they do too. (how do you do the copyright thing, damn, well yeah, that shits copyrighted)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its hilarious how people can draw a conclusion about a person after talking to him for 5 minutes or less. I guess thats why Sandusky has been roaming free for 40 years after he was coaching and molesting kids. Im sure he seemed like "down to earth" guy too.

You can sexually assault kids and still be down to earth, just saying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can sexually assault kids and still be down to earth, just saying.

thats true, its was more to the point of people not recognizing that he's a child molester. I mean, I dont think he walks around goin, "ehh get a lo to the ass on that one Charlieee".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's a decent vid with compelling reasons for his opinion. But, my thing is is that you simply can't draft McMillan thinking he is a surefire WR1. There are questions. His 40---rightly or wrongly---will play a part. I'd think that his splits (which will speak more to his game translating to the pros in my mind) are more important.  As much as you're trying to sell us that McMillan is a don't-overthink-it-type-of-player, I wouldn't say that's the case. Workouts will play a part in all of this.  At this point, I like the thought of Tetairoa. That's as much as I can give you right now.
    • If Canales has helped Bryce a “poo ton” and this is what we have then what’s the fuging point? And the offense wasn’t humming with Dalton in there either, except against the raiders who’ll likely be firing their coach after this season.  XL is probably the fourth best looking receiving option on the team right now behind thielen, Coker, and sanders. I don’t think anyone would disagree with that. Who cares about total receiving yards when everyone else has missed time and there’s like 180 yards of receiving a game to go around   and lmao they were “believing” shut the fug up. They lost and for the most part those games were all the defense shutting down the other team. The chiefs turned around and gave up an actual impressive stat line to Aiden O’Connell and I not even the most delusional raiders fans think that means anything. Bryce did nothing against the eagles, the Bucs are a mash unit, and any one of us could have done that Bryce did against the giants and saints.  And as far as who they’d get, they didn’t have any trouble hiring the guy you’re tripping over yourself to defend. They also could have hired Dan Quinn, who’s actually succeeding with a young qb.  And people are acting like the risk of getting paid for not working for five years is a negative. Canales is going to spend the next half a decade getting paid to watch porn in his Bible camp office.
    • the Dallas game definitely quelled the hype. his biggest issue will always be his size, and that shows when he gets sacked. he's simply not big or strong enough to protect the ball. even in the KC game, he fumbled it on a basic sack and thank god icky landed on it. INT's are going to happen, most fans don't understand that tipped balls and wrong routes account for most interceptions. but the wet-bar-of-soap type fumbles upon contact are a huge reg flag. the common theme with players like Darnold and Mayfield who previously played for us and are now excelling makes me want to practice patience more when it comes to the QB position. I think Bryce bought himself another season, perhaps with more weapons. I do like the idea of adding a QB whether that's a FA or mid round rookie. if the same mistakes occur next season and we see no further growth or most importantly, wins, then it will be time to move on. just a quick reminder though, football is not an individual sport. QB is just one position, albeit the most important. 
×
×
  • Create New...