Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jake gunslinger or game manger


scpanther22

Recommended Posts

Lot of talk about this so what do you think Jake is…a gunslinger or game manager

I know gunslinger sound better and game managers have sort of a bad rep for no huge arm strength..But I have heard more people call Jake a game manager than gunslinger

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's more of a personality trait than what their arm does. Obviously weak armed QBs can't strike deep, but the who concept of a gunslinger is something different to just throwing deep.

A gunslinger is a player who feels they need to make plays to get the team to win. They have this inside pressure to always look for the big play and to occassional take big risks in doing so. These kind of players rarely have consistent seasons throughout, but they also win several games with late desperate come backs. The main attribute that fits these guys is a great mental strength. They turn the ball over, often, but they also put up points. They need the strength to always forget the last play and to keep pushing for the win.

A game manager tends to allow the game to play out and waits for mistakes in the defense. The will correctly go through their progressions and often just use the easy dump off to maintain drives rather than going for the big play. They feel it is more important to keep the offense on the field for as long as possible, thus keeping the ball off the ground and the clock ticking. They are also VERY aware of the situation and need to be able to change things at the line. These guys are calm and rarely get riled up as that affects their composure and the game plan.

Jake fits the gunslinger mentality. Strong willed, emotional, driven and will try to win the game if it hangs on the balance.

Most feel the Panthers need a game manager to compliment their running game, but this is not the case. Our offensive scheme uses the passing game as a big play factor to force teams to keep only 8 in the box. If we used more short passing drive maintaining throws, it would allow the safeties to come up and we would find out running game would be smothered. So we use a more aggressive passing game to keep the safeties playing honest. We also feel with a consistent running game we can generally gget a first down with two runs, which allows us to go for a big playand get some big yardage in one go. This also means we do a lot of three and outs, as if the opposition correctly diagnoses our first or second down, we are often put in a tricky third down situation, which neither our passing or running game is suited for.

Jake fits the kind of QB that our scheme needs. We need someone who is not afraid to look for the big play and his career comeback wins speaks volumes that he wins games that are on the line. If you all feel a game manager is what we need, you need to look no further than David Carr. The guy was brilliant at using his check downs and trying to keep the drive going, but that kind of ideal got us stuck as they knew we had no way of going deep. So they stiffled our running and passing game in the same manner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jake was once called a Poor Man's Farve...(sorry had to say it)...we dont need jake sitting back there making dump off and check down throws. We occasionally need the bomb to Smitty to keep defenses honest.... Jake needs to be a gunslinger but manage the game...a sack is better than giving them six....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...we dont need jake sitting back there making dump off and check down throws. We occasionally need the bomb to Smitty to keep defenses honest.... Jake needs to be a gunslinger but manage the game...a sack is better than giving them six....

this can be said of every QB...not every QB can do it. Jake definitely cannot do it on a consistent basis.

Gunslinger and game manager are the two ends of the spectrum. There is no hybrid of the two. There are game managers who can throw deep and there are gunslingers who are really good at handing the ball off to a stud back but there is no such thing as a gunslinger who can manage the game and make the smart play consistently.

In Fox's run first, play smart D scheme I have always felt that a game manager was higher on the priority list to fit the offense and Jake is NOT a true game manager. Not at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pennington threw 4 vs the Ravens and he is not a risk taker type of QB. Sometimes craptacular games turn up at the worst time.

Yeah, but the Ravens defense is quite a few notches above Arizona's.

As for the original question, Jake is a little bit of neither. He's an average QB with one incredibly gifted WR. Look back at the SD and CHI games last year. Jake couldn't throw the "lob it deep and let Smitty do the work" passes, so he had to actually make plays. And he did. Now look at the GB and NO games. We won both games because Jake threw up a prayer and Smitty answered it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would a game manger be what Touchdown Jesus was born in? :confused:

0-4-touchdown-jesus.JPG

As to the topic, he's a gunslinger, and that's exactly what an offense under John Fox needs. If Fox had a game manager running his conservative attack, we'd have no spark at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this can be said of every QB...not every QB can do it. Jake definitely cannot do it on a consistent basis.

Gunslinger and game manager are the two ends of the spectrum. There is no hybrid of the two. There are game managers who can throw deep and there are gunslingers who are really good at handing the ball off to a stud back but there is no such thing as a gunslinger who can manage the game and make the smart play consistently.

In Fox's run first, play smart D scheme I have always felt that a game manager was higher on the priority list to fit the offense and Jake is NOT a true game manager. Not at all.

You are wrong....while QB's can be one or the other they can work on perfecting the other.... A Gunslinger can manage the game when needed...i.e. brett Farve's best years was when he was able to manage the game and not have to force issues....A game manager can sometimes foce issues to keep defenses honest....Peyton Manning, Drew Brees and Phillip rivers are good examples of a QB being able to use both....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That would be a great pick, he might be my favorite for us right now. 
    • The coach- Canales was a rookie hc and at times looked like it. But he did manage to revamp the offense, helped Bryce not look like the biggest bust of the draft, exuded positivity,  and made the panthers watchable again. We have a viable head coach for the first time since rivera The gm- Morgan had some hits and some big misses. Hits- the ol, Coker,demani, dj at first. Misses- almost every d player signed, brooks, the jury is out on x. I get what he was trying to do with brooks/Hubbard but it blew up in his face. Hopefully he learns from his mistakes. But he did trade mingo for a 4th, managed to get a 2nd rounder this year from the Rams and I am a fan of constantly churning the bottom of the roster The draft- x can be a solid player but not until he catches the ball, brooks was a high risk pick that didn't work out, Wallace, demani and Chau Smith can be solid contributors and showed glimpses, Coker and jt should be mainstays. And flipping a 7th round lb that was about to be cut for Jackson was a great move.  The offense- had its ups and downs but Bryce has turned from one of the biggest busts in nfl history to a potential franchise qb, that change is worth its weight in gold, thielen was crafty and underrated as usual, Coker was a gem, jt was the solid but has some growing to do, and Hubbard has been awesome, the o line was much improved as well The defense- well...they set records, injuries, poor coaching (imo), bad playcalling and just plain sucking this defense needs everything to change, we need horn and Jackson back and we get brown back but we need bodies and an identity. If they can do with the def what they did with the o then we can challenge for the division bc we already have some pieces there.  Overall- this was a growth year full of questions and some of the major ones were answered(qb, coach). For the first time in a long time the season didn't end depressingly and I do have cautious optimism for next year. But they need to learn from the mistakes of 2024 and if they do I like where this team is headed. On to the draft and 2025
×
×
  • Create New...