Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mass Effect 3: Extended Cut


Doc Holiday

Recommended Posts

I agree that it doesn't need to be perfect ending, just the whole god child/Mass Relays exploding/team some how ending up on normandy could use a little bit of explanation.

and if the ending was really indoctrination a slight hint that it was would have be awesome too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that it doesn't need to be perfect ending, just the whole god child/Mass Relays exploding/team some how ending up on normandy could use a little bit of explanation.

and if the ending was really indoctrination a slight hint that it was would have be awesome too.

This here would be awesome. I I honestly enjoyed the fug out of ME3, and the multiplayer. I would really like to see decisions have a little more significance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well as I've heard there is only about 5 minutes of added gameplay to a playthrough, yet the file size is 2GB (the size of lair of the shadow broker which was hours of gameplay), my guess would be it's like a dozen alternate endings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The ending made no sense and the scenes portrayed violated the story as presented even by the starchild. I doubt the extended cut does anything to fix it. EA has killed one of the best game studios of all time. I have been a fan since Baldur's Gate and Fallout when they were Black Isle and cannot believe what has happened to this once great developer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well as I've heard there is only about 5 minutes of added gameplay to a playthrough, yet the file size is 2GB (the size of lair of the shadow broker which was hours of gameplay), my guess would be it's like a dozen alternate endings.

Probably just a bunch of cutscenes for each of the already established endings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The ending made no sense and the scenes portrayed violated the story as presented even by the starchild. I doubt the extended cut does anything to fix it. EA has killed one of the best game studios of all time. I have been a fan since Baldur's Gate and Fallout when they were Black Isle and cannot believe what has happened to this once great developer.

Black Isle turned into Obsidian, not Bioware. But yeah I agree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ME3's faults had nothing to do with EA and everything to do with Drew Karpyshyn, the writer of ME1 and architect of the ME universe, leaving in the middle of ME2. His written intended ending had to do with dark energy, and you were to be presented with the choice to sacrifice all of humanity to save the rest of organic life. But the new writer Mac Walters scrapped it and went with "Shepard plays Deux Ex, the end."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

just watched a lot of the new ending on youtube, nothing earth shattering but at least they filled in a lot of the holes for the most part, I did notice that in all the endings that the relays don't blow up like they did originally, I do enjoy how the fan base was able to call bs enough to make a real change in the game

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Did I mention that he was on worse teams?  Yes.  Do QBs alone win games?  No.  Did Cam, on a much better team with some awesome defenses ever have 2 consecutive winning seasons?  No.  So now you are cherry picking,  If the overall stats are similar, you take a look at him.   I told you that you look at his skill set---but you wanted to tell me that he sucks and mentioned performance.  I just presented performance--and his numbers are very similar to Cam Newton's numbers--a player most call the best Panther QB ever--and I agree.  By the way, Fumbles are evidence of how bad his OL has been--so you are saying that a QB in a situation worse than Cam's who has stats and physical abilities very similar to Cam's should not be given a look when you have Bryce Young at QB?  You are going with that story because you simply talked your way into a corner and now you are trying to save face.  No good GM would do what you suggest because "he sucks."  Sorry, but the facts do not support you.  But no matter what eye-opening details I provide, there are some who are going to go their Google machines to try to find some reason to support an ignorant approach to developing the QB position.  You ignored the similarities to Cam and went cherry picking.  I know what you are doing--but I am only suggesting (as I have stated before) that we bring him in as one of three approaches to resolving the QB issue. Compete with Bryce and draft a QB. Basically, I am suggesting that Jones has the potential to replace Dalton and compete with Young.  He is a battered stock that could get better in a better situation--that is human nature.  Instead, I am called a Daniel Jones lover and superfan.  That is good debate--But a real sign of mature thinking is the inability to LOGICALLY consider alternative perspectives--which is actually a characteristic of intelligence.  Just so you know, I critique and perform research in my job.  I am often amazed at how the numbers do not support my suppositions.  I learned that my impression is often wrong until I look at the data.  In this case, I have considered all the important variables and he should get a shot.  Numbers don't lie--and when you and others resort to twisted name calling directed toward the poster--it verifies my position.  
    • I don’t get this, I know that is the popular thought process but I just don’t think it’s true.  For instance head to head last year the ACC had a winning record against the SEC.  The SEC had a losing record in bowl games. This year so far the head to head is 2-3 SEC and that’s with a fluke Vandy win in week one.  I see the ACC taking another head to head winning season after next week.  The SEC is mostly hype with 3 good teams, in my opinion.  But to say any ACC team would get exposed I believe is a stretch 
    • What the hell?  How is presenting Cam's stats hating him?  The point is not to hate Cam, it is to show you how similar Jones is to him and why you take a look at him.  I mentioned Jones has the skill set to take a look--the response is, "look at his 5 years of performance."  So I compare him to the greatest QB in franchise history, and the stats are similar--while Jones was in a worse situation.  Now that is "hating?"  Come on.  This is a meritless, ignorant, personal attack because you are wrong.  Just stop it.  You all attack the poster when you have nothing.  So saying "we should consider a guy with similar stats and size to Cam Newton" is now hating Cam and making me a Jones super fan- that is just stupid.  
×
×
  • Create New...