Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Plaxico coming to Charlotte?


CollegePanther

Recommended Posts

They're not, and they're not going to. Let's quit beating this dead horse.

that dead horse is going to get beat up continually until the next big name free agent WR comes available or says he wants to play for the panthers.

smitty essentially said that barring any injury to one of the players, plax most likely won't be called. that's not just plax, either. that's pretty much any WRs that are out there.

whether we feel comfortable with them or not...whether we feel the team should be comfortable with them or not...the guys on the roster are the guys they are intending to go into the season with and from all signs, they are more than ok with that. get used to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why not give Plax a chance to prove himself before denying access to our program. Offer him a conditional one year contract. He would have everything to lose and we would have everything to gain, who knows maybe a Superbowl winning catch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Bwood

Steve Smith: "I don't want to burst his bubble but my Carolina sources have pretty much come out already and said that they aren't interested."

So why the fug are we still talking about this? Shut up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why not give Plax a chance to prove himself before denying access to our program. Offer him a conditional one year contract. He would have everything to lose and we would have everything to gain, who knows maybe a Superbowl winning catch.

Because one the main issues with him is that he is asking for too much and it is believed to be one of the the reasons he is still available.

http://www.nypost.com/p/blogs/jetsblog/former_jets_agent_burress_asking_Y0ZGYT0HCI9BoxHkdF3IdO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

that dead horse is going to get beat up continually until the next big name free agent WR comes available or says he wants to play for the panthers.

smitty essentially said that barring any injury to one of the players, plax most likely won't be called. that's not just plax, either. that's pretty much any WRs that are out there.

whether we feel comfortable with them or not...whether we feel the team should be comfortable with them or not...the guys on the roster are the guys they are intending to go into the season with and from all signs, they are more than ok with that. get used to it.

Phuck, man, how can we not be used to it? It's been forced down our throats like Castoria when we were kids.

What really disturbs me, other than our FO's history with drafting and signing WRs, is that when you look at teams who have historically won the Super Bowl, they seem to always have more than one known, legitimate threat at WR (and, let's not bring up the 2000 Ravens, please). They have always had at least two actual WRs that your average football guy could name. History appears to say that you even need at least two to get you to the dance.

Ask your buddies who root for other franchises, especially outside of the NFC South, to name our WRs. The only ones who may know someone more than Smith are the fantasy football geeks. You can talk about LaFell and Gettis all you want, but everybody knows Victor Cruz (for obvious reasons, but that's exactly the point when you think about it). Cruz became a known commodity with lightning quickness. Moroever, the toughest teams in the league absolutely have more than one known and proven threat at WR, and a few of them have added to their fire power.

Yeah we have Olsen, but I don't think one pass catching TE can take the place of a threat at WR. I could argue that the reason that the Chargers have not (and will not) win a championship is because they just refused to maximize their weak link at WR. V-Jax and Gates (& Tomlinson) just were not enough. I hope that someone steps up, but our offense is kinda putting me in the mind of the Chargers right now. TEs (and pass catching RBs to a lesser extent) are supposed to add to the WRs imo, not take the place of WRs.

Moreover, someone (CSX maybe) said any team is screwed that loses their top guy. This is true in a sense, but the big dogs at least have someone that your average NFL fan can name to step up and hold the fort together. Think of all the top prolific offenses in this league, and then think of ours if Smitty were to get injured. Hell, as a Panthers homer, think of what happens if LaFell gets injured. This is not true with the big dogs...one monkey doesn't stop the show.

Like I said before in this thread, our FO specializes in question marks at WR as opposed to exclamation points, and this has lessened our effectiveness on offense (even with Cam).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Phuck, man, how can we not be used to it? It's been forced down our throats like Castoria when we were kids.

What really disturbs me, other than our FO's history with drafting and signing WRs, is that when you look at teams who have historically won the Super Bowl, they seem to always have more than one known, legitimate threat at WR (and, let's not bring up the 2000 Ravens, please). They have always had at least two actual WRs that your average football guy could name. History appears to say that you even need at least two to get you to the dance.

Ask your buddies who root for other franchises, especially outside of the NFC South, to name our WRs. The only ones who may know someone more than Smith are the fantasy football geeks. You can talk about LaFell and Gettis all you want, but everybody knows Victor Cruz (for obvious reasons, but that's exactly the point when you think about it). Cruz became a known commodity with lightning quickness. Moroever, the toughest teams in the league absolutely have more than one known and proven threat at WR, and a few of them have added to their fire power.

Yeah we have Olsen, but I don't think one pass catching TE can take the place of a threat at WR. I could argue that the reason that the Chargers have not (and will not) win a championship is because they just refused to maximize their weak link at WR. V-Jax and Gates (& Tomlinson) just were not enough. I hope that someone steps up, but our offense is kinda putting me in the mind of the Chargers right now. TEs (and pass catching RBs to a lesser extent) are supposed to add to the WRs imo, not take the place of WRs.

Moreover, someone (CSX maybe) said any team is screwed that loses their top guy. This is true in a sense, but the big dogs at least have someone that your average NFL fan can name to step up and hold the fort together. Think of all the top prolific offenses in this league, and then think of ours if Smitty were to get injured. Hell, as a Panthers homer, think of what happens if LaFell gets injured. This is not true with the big dogs...one monkey doesn't stop the show.

Like I said before in this thread, our FO specializes in question marks at WR as opposed to exclamation points, and this has lessened our effectiveness on offense (even with Cam).

Cruz was an unknown before last season. He had zero catches. Everyone wants a Cruz but nobody wants to give a Cruz type guy a chance.

The comment I made earlier was in response to someone who asked what would we do if something happened to our two starters. If both went down we'd simply be screwed. I don't know a team that wouldn't be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why is thread still going on, I thought we already said we are not interested.......

Because it's slow and I find the topic still more interesting than top 25 lists, the weight of a Falcon player, or the replay of a game from nearly 6 years ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Bwood

Because it's slow and I find the topic still more interesting than top 25 lists, the weight of a Falcon player, or the replay of a game from nearly 6 years ago.

So you're going to talk about bringing in a player that will never come here and that's already a fact?

Okay lemme join! I think we should try to make a move for Mario Williams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you're going to talk about bringing in a player that will never come here and that's already a fact?

Okay lemme join! I think we should try to make a move for Mario Williams.

I'm talking about our WR situation and the current issues with the team. Read before commenting and you will see my take on it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Bwood

I'm talking about our WR situation and the current issues with the team. Read before commenting and you will see my take on it.

No you aren't haha....

All you said is that if our 2 starting receivers were to go down we would be screwed. That's a just a morbid thought.

Stop bumping this fuging thread, let it die. I'll bump this crap when Gettis and LaFell blow up the league next season and Plaxico shoot's his other foot while still in free agency.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • his height, size and arm will forever cause problems and limitations...that is what it is.  I think to a degree, the law of averages is just coming into play a bit with him.  So as he plays more and more, you just flat out get the decent days mixed in too.  Which is just going to happen. 
    • Good point. He's definitely better in 10-15 yards. I think that's his biggest improvement. But he wasn't 3-10 +15, he was 3-7, with at least one drop (minor but still). And with multiple passes at 14 yards completed. This passing chart doesn't look like at By one, lol. He threw more "deep" passes than Mahomes (NOT comparing him to Mahomes in a skill way lol), or at least more beyind 10 yards.
    • Karlaftis and Danna have been pretty inconsistent so teams have been doubling Jones and able to contain their pass rush.   But the good thing is that yesterday, we schemed well against Steve Spags Defense, Canales married the surrounding personnel with his QB through play designs within his comfort zone and was able to get downfield at will.  He was able to execute higher difficulty throws and look a lot more comfortable.  It tells me that Canales has a good system in mind, and had an edge gameplanning wise against Spagnuolo - which is nice to see.  It's a bit to see-saw at times with either going way too pass heavy or way too run heavy, but I think he's finding out what works.  It takes time to have it come together, and sure, I could see regression happen against a better front-7, but this was good for the entire system gelling.    
×
×
  • Create New...