Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Trade Speculation: 'Cats No. 2 pick for James Harden per CBSSports Blog


cdandi1

Recommended Posts

http://www.cbssports...-deal-no-2-pick

The Charlotte Bobcats are eyeing the possibility of dealing the No. 2 overall pick in a trade that would bring a more established player, multiple sources told CBSSports.com.

One source said that Oklahoma City's James Harden could be in play due to the Thunder's salary situation following next season. GM Sam Presti already has Kevin Durant and Russell Westbrook on the books for more than $29 million next season -- and both Harden and Serge Ibaka will command huge contracts after the 2012-13 campaign

None of these players is considered a franchise-changer -- and that's why the Bobcats would prefer to deal the pick and land an established player such as Harden who could come in immediately and make an impact.

My only question would be..would he sign a contract extension?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One thing to remember is, that any trade for our pick would have to net us a no 1 pick in return. With Chicago holding a protected 1st of ours, the NBA won't allow any trade that has the possibility of us going 2 years in a row without a first rounder. As remote as it would be, trading for Harden straight up would leave open the chance that we wouldn't have a first rounder this year and next. OKC would have to give us their 1st along with Harden. That probably wouldn't be a big deal for the Thunder as any player at that spot wouldn't be a game changer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would be really nice to get a player like Harden, who can create for others off the dribble and would immediately come in with the best 3 point shot on the team. I'm just not sure he will be worth the big contract its going to take to keep him around, considering his somewhat irregular minutes with the Thunder (usually playing with the 2nd unit) and his below average defense. He is still young, so I guess the question is, do you think he can develop into a go to player (if not the only one, then one of the top 2 or 3 players on a successful team)?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One thing to remember is, that any trade for our pick would have to net us a no 1 pick in return. With Chicago holding a protected 1st of ours, the NBA won't allow any trade that has the possibility of us going 2 years in a row without a first rounder. As remote as it would be, trading for Harden straight up would leave open the chance that we wouldn't have a first rounder this year and next. OKC would have to give us their 1st along with Harden. That probably wouldn't be a big deal for the Thunder as any player at that spot wouldn't be a game changer.

we have two firsts next year anyway, and the pick we owe Chicago is protected enough so that it won't be a factor next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like James Harden but I only do this trade if Harden signs an extension and we get their first pick in return.

I dont see any way though that OKC trades Harden. They will sign Harden and trade Ibaka or Perkins if they needed to clear up space.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like James Harden but I only do this trade if Harden signs an extension and we get their first pick in return.

I dont see any way though that OKC trades Harden. They will sign Harden and trade Ibaka or Perkins if they needed to clear up space.

The thing is, its going to be very difficult to keep both Harden and Ibaka once their rookie contracts are done, and I just dont see OKC letting Ibaka go. You could argue (correctly imo) Harden was a bigger part of their success this season, but 22 year olds who lead the NBA in blocked shots dont come around often. And since OKC has already built their team around 2 perimeter players in Westbrook and Durant, it kind of leaves Harden as the odd man out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Exactly the type of thing he would have done here. The excuse people were stannin’ so hard claiming he would have looked just as bad. Just not true. 
    • Yes and there aren't 32 starting QBs in the league either. Too many teams and too many games. The NFL has regressed over the years and game quality is lacking. The other leagues are supposed to be farm leagues but it doesn't matter. You just won't have 32 no matter what they do. The move to super athletes playing QB at all levels has lead to this. It used to be those guys played other positions but now they are QBs who can't really QB.  It has a trickle down effect too. OL can't block because they never had to. The fact that in today's game your QB must be able to run at least a little to survive is evidence of this as well. IMO they have ruined the game same as with the NBA. It's been simplified to the point of being boring.  Just look at the top 10 this season. Patrick Mahomes (Chiefs) Joe Burrow (Bengals) Josh Allen (Bills) Lamar Jackson (Ravens) Dak Prescott (Cowboys) Jalen Hurts (Eagles) Brock Purdy (49ers) Jordan Love (Packers) Justin Herbert (Chargers) Matthew Stafford (Rams) Once we get to number 5 the stats look like this: 167 262 1,845 63.7 7.0 10 8 65 18 84.5   47.5   10 TDs and 8 INTs??? At number 5??? There was a time not that long ago that he wouldn't even be a starter.   
    • I'm not convinced that the NFL is any better or worse at developing QBs now than they were 20 years ago.  I mean I'm sure there are some developmental issues at play, just not sure it is any different than it has been. The biggest difference IMO is that NFL teams are waaaaaaaay more willing to invest a 1st round pick into a QB now than they were 15-20 years ago.  A guy like Colin Kaepernick would probably be a top 5 pick in 2025, whereas he went in the 2nd in 2011.  Would a guy like Trey Lance go top 3 in 2010?  Hell no.  Look at Russell Wilson - he didn't go until the 3rd round.  The standard for being a 1st round QB has dropped. So it may seem like we're seeing more high-profile busts at the position, but we're also seeing teams reach for QBs way more than they have in the past.  Someone with Anthony Richardson's college resume doesn't go in the top 3 20 years ago.  
×
×
  • Create New...