Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

On the flipside of the "Top 100" discussion...


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

Pretty sure I know the answer, but is there anyone on this board that feels that ranking Cam Newton higher than Vick (30 spots higher, to be specific) is in any way unjustified?

Rookie Cam Newton IMO was slightly better than vet Mike Vick overall....

But 30 spots....gets tricky with do many spots. I would slightly rank him ahead as far as 2011 QBs go. A couple spots at most

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Newton is in the 40s then Vick is surely no lower than in the 70s. After all Newton as a rookie was far better than Vick who can't even manage to stay healthy for 16 games. He accounted for 19 TDs and 18 INTs/Fumbles. Compare that with Newton's 35TDs and 19 INTs/Fumbles and it is no comparison. Vick should be happy he made in into the top 100 at all last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...