Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

My Question Regarding The Bounties And Lawsuits


Recommended Posts

OK, I'm sure this can be merged into one of the countless other threads but this has been bugging me for quite some time. Everytime they bring up the players appeals they mention the key point as being that their actions took place before the new CBA was in place. Ok? Fair enough. I see their point.

Now here is the kicker:

The league specifically mentions four players who were targeted with bounties. They were Brett Favre, Kurt Warner, Aaron Rodgers and Cam Newton. Favre and Warner are retired, and Rodgers plays in the NFC North.

Cam Newton and Aaron Rodgers were admitted targets of the bounty system... THIS season. Now, how exactly can that statment hold any water about it being before the CBA when there were two targets right after the new deal was in place.

I dont know, am I missing something? Am I looking at this wrong or what? Because the fact that I havent heard an analyst mention this at all is a head scratcher. :huh:

http://espn.go.com/b...eted-cam-newton

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's nothing new in today's society. No integrity or ownership of your actions whatsoever. Vilma's like the guy who got caught on camera stealing merchandise who still swears up & down till he's blue in the face he didn't do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I personally believe that Vilma has a solid case against Goodell in his defamation suit. I haven't personally seen any evidence (not saying there isn't any) that straight up proves that this was Vilma's personal money on the table...

Goodell seems to have acted on the premise that it was in fact Vilma's cash... IF* it wasn't and IF* that can be proven... Goodell is fugged!

I'm looking at this particular situation as a person... Not a Panthers fan. I'm in no way taking up for Vilma... I'm just saying... Goodell made some very public statements in regards to Vilma, and if they're not true... Man this could get ugly. Time will tell

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I personally believe that Vilma has a solid case against Goodell in his defamation suit. I haven't personally seen any evidence (not saying there isn't any) that straight up proves that this was Vilma's personal money on the table...

Goodell seems to have acted on the premise that it was in fact Vilma's cash... IF* it wasn't and IF* that can be proven... Goodell is fugged!

I'm looking at this particular situation as a person... Not a Panthers fan. I'm in no way taking up for Vilma... I'm just saying... Goodell made some very public statements in regards to Vilma, and if they're not true... Man this could get ugly. Time will tell

Even if Goodell's statements were true, and he is convicted of defamation of character, what exactly is going to happen to Goodell? He's going to hand some cash to Vilma? Big deal. He's not going to lose his job over this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even if Goodell's statements were true, and he is convicted of defamation of character, what exactly is going to happen to Goodell? He's going to hand some cash to Vilma? Big deal. He's not going to lose his job over this.

IF* Vilma were to win... (and I honestly don't see it happening) I would say that Goodell has a pretty high chance that Goodell (The face of the NFL) would have a very high chance of being replaced. You just can't make statements like that, with those implications, at that level. (Which is why I have to believe that Goodell is sitting on some pretty overwhelming evidence in his own favor)

Like I said though, I can't wait to see this really play out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IF* Vilma were to win... (and I honestly don't see it happening) I would say that Goodell has a pretty high chance that Goodell (The face of the NFL) would have a very high chance of being replaced. You just can't make statements like that, with those implications, at that level. (Which is why I have to believe that Goodell is sitting on some pretty overwhelming evidence in his own favor)

Like I said though, I can't wait to see this really play out.

Doubt it. The owners and NFLPA would still be overwhelmingly favoring Goodell as commissioner. Even if one small aspect of Goodell's statement is an out and out lie, the intentions behind it are still enforcing player safety.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I personally believe that Vilma has a solid case against Goodell in his defamation suit. I haven't personally seen any evidence (not saying there isn't any) that straight up proves that this was Vilma's personal money on the table...

Goodell seems to have acted on the premise that it was in fact Vilma's cash... IF* it wasn't and IF* that can be proven... Goodell is fugged!

I'm looking at this particular situation as a person... Not a Panthers fan. I'm in no way taking up for Vilma... I'm just saying... Goodell made some very public statements in regards to Vilma, and if they're not true... Man this could get ugly. Time will tell

It isn't going to get ugly. They have the evidence or Goodell wouldn't have suspended him the entire year. They haven't shown Vilma evidence or released it to the public because he isn't in a position of authority to make demands. Roger Goodell openly invited Vilma & his lawyers to a meeting at his office to discuss the situation & go over the evidence. Vilma declined & ignored him. Vilma is just in denial much like Saints** fans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This whole lawsuit thing is a joke and the only person benefitting is Vilma's lawyer. Slander is extremely difficult to prove and on top of that there usually needs to be an element of malice or desire to cause harm without justification or for spite. Essentially Goddell woke up one morning and thought it would be a good idea to trump up charges and go after the entire organization just to suspend Vilma.

Exaggerating for clarity but Vilma's attorney would probably have to prove something like that for this to cause Roger to lose sleep.

Good news is its the off season and it should help us get through June and July

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I personally believe that Vilma has a solid case against Goodell in his defamation suit. I haven't personally seen any evidence (not saying there isn't any) that straight up proves that this was Vilma's personal money on the table...

Goodell seems to have acted on the premise that it was in fact Vilma's cash... IF* it wasn't and IF* that can be proven... Goodell is fugged!

I'm looking at this particular situation as a person... Not a Panthers fan. I'm in no way taking up for Vilma... I'm just saying... Goodell made some very public statements in regards to Vilma, and if they're not true... Man this could get ugly. Time will tell

I realize you've got a lot of ifs in your post but you touched on something Ive seen a number of people talk about.

Whether or not it was Vilma's personal money or not is of zero consequence.

People are trying to make something out of that and when you read Vilma's statements he seems to focus on things like " I never offered any of my money for ..." Doesn't matter if GW gave him the cash to offer up as reward, he extended the offer. Just like it wouldn't matter if I gave you the cash to hire someone to beat someone up for me. If you got busted hiring the person its still on you. You don't get a pass because it wasn't your money.

And Vilma wont either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We could easily pick apart yesterday’s game: dropped passes, blown coverages, bad tackling and red zone issues to name a few. But it was clear that this wasn’t the same team from earlier in the season. They fought back and hung with the champs until the end. That’s what I was excited to see and it gives me hope that we’re on the right track.
    • I think BY played well today and exceeded expectations. I will temper future expectations as he has to string together many games of consistent quality. One game doesn’t convince me that he is a franchise QB or even a guy you want to stick with for another season. One game doesn’t erase all the negative play and limitations from the past couple of years. I hope he balls out and continues to get better but for me the verdict is still out   That said, I think he gave the team and fans hope yesterday which is a lot more than what we had when we woke up Sunday morning. 
    • He was vastly improved today and we need to see more of Bryce the rest of the season to continue evaluate him in order to decide what the heck to do with him at the end of the season. He must play at least like this and improve more from here the rest of the season in order for me to keep him. No more 123 yard passing games and want to see at least this output weekly from him. If this is Bruce improving slowly over time then Canales is even better with developing QB's than I thought he was but still too early to tell and we need to see him the rest of the way as he has at very least earned back the starting gig moving forward.
×
×
  • Create New...