Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Joe Adams...4.25 40 Time?


SetfreexX

Recommended Posts

Just making sure but people don't actually believe this, right? There is a reason nobody puts much stock in Pro Day times. All are exaggerated, primarily due to the track/field and all.

He's faster on the field than his combine 40 indicates. But he definitely isn't close to a 4.2 guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whenever a guy comes out of Arky, take his 40 with a grain of salt

According to their coaches and their fanbase, at any given moment they have 20 players on their team that can run a 4.25

Hand times are really inaccurate...it all depends on when the coaches stop it. Florida under Meyer used to have a bunch of guys under 4.3 too. I think coaches do it to encourage competition within the team

We did have a lot of fast players the past few years but none are 4.2's obviously

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fans get too wrapped up in 40 times.

On a 20 yard pass play, given the same ratio of takeoff to final speed, cutting ability, etc., there will be less than a foot separating the 4.25 guy from the 4.55 guy.

Joe is fast enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The thing I like about Joe Adams that made me a huge fan of him before the draft was his quickness. Joe's straight line speed isn't as good as a young Steve Smith, but Adams has Smith's elusiveness sideline to sideline and has a nose for where the holes will open up. To be honest I'm still surprised he was there in the 4th, he was at least lower 2nd-3 round value that we got in the 4th.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...