Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What Is Hollywood Thinking?


charlotte49er

Recommended Posts

That sequels to bad movies will be better?

This Summer we get the "Over the Hill Gang" in the "Expendables 2!"

Now Hollywood is looking to make "Dukes of Hazard 2?"

There are so many good books out there that could be made into good movies, instead we keep getting fed the SOS!

I'd almost rather see Snake Plisskin escape from Tuscon before these 2 movies. If you dont know who Snake Plisskin is, that's just sad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our definition of bad is different than the definition used by studios. "Bad" for them is any film that doesn't make money. A film that makes money, in this age of media, will get a sequel no matter what. It's why there was a string of those awful "_____ Movie" parodies awhile back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That sequels to bad movies will be better?

This Summer we get the "Over the Hill Gang" in the "Expendables 2!"

Now Hollywood is looking to make "Dukes of Hazard 2?"

There are so many good books out there that could be made into good movies, instead we keep getting fed the SOS!

I'd almost rather see Snake Plisskin escape from Tuscon before these 2 movies. If you dont know who Snake Plisskin is, that's just sad.

Dukes 2 tell me more??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dukes 2 tell me more??

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-31749_162-57428063-10391698/dukes-of-hazzard-being-rebooted/

Dukes of Hazzard being rebooted?

(CBS News) "Observe and Report" director and HBO's "Eastbound and Down" co-creator Jody Hill are reportedly writing and attached to direct an untitled action film set in the American South for Warner Bros. that some are speculating is a "Dukes of Hazzard" reboot.

According to The Hollywood Reporter, the story is set in the 1970s South and involves an outlaw duo.

"The Dukes of Hazzard" was originally a CBS TV show that aired from 1979-1985 starring Tom Wopat and John Schneider. The series was turned into a movie in 2005 starring Seann William Scott and Johnny Knoxville.

Billy Gerber, who produced the 2005 film, is also attached to produce with Hill.

Good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you want great acting and great stories in your movies, follow the independent movie scene, THAT is where the really amazing movies are. Clooney's "The Descendants" or the movie "Take Shelter" are recent examples. There are still great movies being made, just not always at the theater.

Not to mention a lot of movies aren't made for people in the US anymore. It's a worldwide thing now, and a lot of times they can make more overseas. So that is taken into account. Example is Avengers, being released overseas first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's really only been 2 games. The NO team was so bad their coach was fired after the game and Chuba and the defense carried the team to the win against NY. He's played better but I'm not willing to crown him QB god yet. I want to see more than 2 games or even the rest of the season. I want a full 3rd season with the occasional clunker because it happens to every QB, even the great ones. I just need more than what we've seen to this point. 
    • So you proceed to let me have it since I’m asking for it lmfao by saying we’re not talking about a random if….what in your head doesn’t click If statements are not realistic. If statements allow me to say anything and make it sound logical. “If” statements in this forum allow anyone without real statistical evidence or factual proof say anything will or can happen so speak directly to facts without these goofy azz if statements or accept all “if” statements. And to respond to your nonsense he had weapons he had protection. He had a rookie WR playing his first NFL game with Mingo and DJ as his other primary targets. How have either preformed since being traded let’s go deeper into that he had weapons. His top targets(week one) XL 7 targets DJ 6 targets Mingo 5 targets now the rookie has has about 8-9 games before Bryce’s return and we’ve seen XL develop some since the start of the season. And those other TOP weapons have a combined 3 catches in a combined 9 games since being traded. 5 for DJ 4 for Mingo these are the top targets your refer to as who he should have been shining with. Is it all on Bryce or these WRs being actual liabilities and not good players does that matter to you or should Bryce be able to elevate them? Do you really know football or is this my 12 yr old nephew spewing a childish mindset and asking us to accept it as serious football talk.  I’ve just seen the post from @Icege It’s sad after being shown actual facts you don’t know what you should be eating crow about buddy grow tf up. It’s ok to be wrong it doesn’t make you a bad guy you’re just wrong about Bryce . You said quote “Bryce can’t throw down field” do you still feel that way? You said a lot of nonsense that has now been proven wrong but we need to keep waiting right ok kool. I can agree with that we need more much more good play before we fully commit for next season, but to act like the progression being shown isn’t impressive as sht. We’re seeing Bryce play good while waiting on more consistency to crown em but you gotta get out of that dark place because living in denial is a bad place to reside.
    • Thielen is a free agent, isn't he? And regardless we need a younger version of him anyway. I see XL + Coker as our #1 and #2 with Palmer as the #3 in that scenario.
×
×
  • Create New...