Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Your Favorite Place To Sit In Boa And Best Bang For Buck..


Recommended Posts

Close to pulling the trigger on season tickets. Dilemma is I can get club seats all over for face which at best is 3k for a pair for season, lower level sideline arent much cheaper if at all, or I can sit in the 500's top 5 rows for half or even less than half or sit my ass at home in front of an HDTV for free.

So onto the question what sections have you guys sat in and your favorites for the money?

Thanks for any input

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My seats are in 529. I am biased since I shelled out the cash for the PSLs, but I love the view. Right down the center of the field. The PSLs in the lower bowl are just too much to justify at this point. Maybe down the road I will upgrade to lowers, but for my money the upper deck endzones are the best as long as you are like row 15 or lower. Plus my seats are on the aisle which is great for piss breaks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While I do love BoA, and seeing the Panthers play live, I'd much rather save my money, buy a huge TV, and watch the game at home. The beer and food is cheaper, I can see the players in HD, I can Huddle chat during the game, and I have ac/heat. Also, I go see Training Camp every year, so I don't really care about seeing the games live. It's way more personal at Training Camp.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like watching at home as well, but damn I love the tailgating before a game. Something about getting down there at 8:30am and firing up the grill and cracking open a brew. Turning on the music, hoisting the flags. Talking a little smack to the opposing retards. Love that stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like endzone 10 rows or higher. I usually grab a couple of clubs(scalped) a year for ease of urination and drinkage. But bang for the buck? Endzone for me. You get lucky sometimes like the 1st game of our SB year where I was like row20 and saw Proehl catch to beat Jacksonville first game. I knew both feet were in before the ref.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have sat all over the stadium. I'll run down some pros and cons.

-North Side of the stadium is in the sun for day games. Especially in the 500lvl. You will be dealing with the sun in your eyes really bad at 4 oclock games second half of the season.

-South Side of the stadium is in the shade for most games. I remember one game being upper level in the shade in December. The breeze and shade froze me out.

- Last 2-3 rows of the club level are great on rainy days. There is a little overhang that will keep you dry unless the wind is bad. Also these seats are closest to concessions and restrooms

-Club Level restrooms are better and in some cases concessions are better.

-Being close to the field can be great when the action is near by. But all to often you will be watching the game on the jumbo tron. It's probably not so bad if you are between the 30 yard lines but either endzone you miss some of the action. Of course it's awesome when Steve catches a TD right in your face!

-500 level seats give a great birds eye view but consider your age. If you intend to hold the seats for a long time the journey will become more arduous each season.

-500 level seats have a rougher crowd. I'm blue collar as anyone but some people can't handle it.

-South and West side have a view of Charlotte depending on lvl. Can be nice for night games.

- The majority of people park and enter from the North gate. There's almost never a line to get in on the south side. It cane take a long time to get in from the North.

-Panthers bench is on the South Side, away team on the North

My personal goal is to own 300 level seats. They give a decent view while still being close enough to the action. I'm 26 so I need a few raises and to save some but that is the "dream scenario". There is nothing wrong with the 500 level. It gives you a great view. The one thing that can stink is being SW,NW,SE,NE corners of the stadium because you cannot tell if a field goal is good all of the time. I was celebrating against Minnesota last year and it turned out to be no good.

If you can afford it, great! Those expensive seats will feel really expensive in a season like 2010 or 2001.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While I do love BoA, and seeing the Panthers play live, I'd much rather save my money, buy a huge TV, and watch the game at home. The beer and food is cheaper, I can see the players in HD, I can Huddle chat during the game, and I have ac/heat. Also, I go see Training Camp every year, so I don't really care about seeing the games live. It's way more personal at Training Camp.

That is the tough thing. The experience fans can create at home is so nice with HD TVs and cheaper beer. Still when Newton goes up against Brees or Manning, YOU WERE THERE It's a great feeling that is far to rare at BofA. I try to go and be as loud as possible for the players, for the television, and for pride. I hate when people call us a Whine and Cheese crowd. I want to be that younger rabid fan that makes BofA our house.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is the tough thing. The experience fans can create at home is so nice with HD TVs and cheaper beer. Still when Newton goes up against Brees or Manning, YOU WERE THERE It's a great feeling that is far to rare at BofA. I try to go and be as loud as possible for the players, for the television, and for pride. I hate when people call us a Whine and Cheese crowd. I want to be that younger rabid fan that makes BofA our house.

I absolutely agree that being there is extra special.

I just think that being home is more of a plus than being there. I still support the team fanatically, I go to Training Camp, I buy merchandise, etc etc.

But, I think there is an inherent problem with going to stadiums now. With gas being expensive, beer and food costing so much, and (good) tickets being expensive, it's so much easier just to sit at home, watch my big screen HD tv, drink multiple beers (that would equal out to cost the same as one beer at the stadium) and adjust the temperature to my liking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been in 128 for the past 2 seasons and have loved it. Now that I live in Charlotte and can afford going to games, I can't think of any reason not to go. You still get to watch half the games from home anyway, and if I'm wanting to be buzzed for a game I'll take care of that before I enter the stadium. I much prefer to sit down low; despite sometimes difficult viewing angles, it's worth it for me to be closer to the action avoid that long walk down at the end of the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only time I've been to games is the lower deck and I really would not like to sit on the lower deck for my money. I've sat in the East end zone pretty much every time I've been and it's hard to see what's going on. I always love sitting in the lower upperdeck in one of the corners when I went to clemson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...