Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bobcats Trade The #1 Pick?


chknwing

Recommended Posts

ok I see the smoke coming out of your ears but hear me out. Bobcats need more than just 1 player. There are many teams with 2 first round picks, cleveland, portland, utah, New Orleans, Boston etc. Would you be willing to give #1 for 2 lower 1sts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't be opposed to it, especially if both of NOLA's lottery picks are top five...but I do have bad memories of the 2005 (?) draft when the 'Cats had two first and took felton/may when they probably should have traded both to get CP3 or Deron Williams. I know it was reported that trading was thought about and discussed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1) We don't know where we are picking yet. 2) IF we have the number 1 pick, then absolutely not. There is no player in the draft on Davis' level. He is the type of guy that can turn around an organization. You build around that type of player. It was what the organization has always needed and never got. Even in year 1 when we should have been able to get Howard, we missed out. But like that, knowing our luck, we won't get the number 1 pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

personally, I dont think Unibrow will be the superstar everyone expects him to be.

I'm with you on this. I personally would like 2 1st rounders, but I can understand the cats going with Davis. His offensive game just scares me

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly I would be completely willing to trade #1. I was thinking about this yesterday as a matter of fact. I am not as in love with the unibrow as everyone else (doesn't mean I think he will stink, just not convinced he is a franchise changer).

If we could get a king's ransom and only move down a couple spots I would do it in a heart beat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

NNNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONOOOOOONOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONNOOOOOONNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONNNNOOOONNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONNNNNNNNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONNNNNNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONNNNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

personally, I dont think Unibrow will be the superstar everyone expects him to be.

I dont think he will be a superstar but a good player. I would trade #1 pick to get 2 lottery picks.

Definitely, especially if we can get the two best Duke and/or UNC players available.

I'd love to have Marshall as the PG, too bad they took Kemba last year and already have Augustin. :(
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • his height, size and arm will forever cause problems and limitations...that is what it is.  I think to a degree, the law of averages is just coming into play a bit with him.  So as he plays more and more, you just flat out get the decent days mixed in too.  Which is just going to happen. 
    • Good point. He's definitely better in 10-15 yards. I think that's his biggest improvement. But he wasn't 3-10 +15, he was 3-7, with at least one drop (minor but still). And with multiple passes at 14 yards completed. This passing chart doesn't look like at By one, lol. He threw more "deep" passes than Mahomes (NOT comparing him to Mahomes in a skill way lol), or at least more beyind 10 yards.
    • Karlaftis and Danna have been pretty inconsistent so teams have been doubling Jones and able to contain their pass rush.   But the good thing is that yesterday, we schemed well against Steve Spags Defense, Canales married the surrounding personnel with his QB through play designs within his comfort zone and was able to get downfield at will.  He was able to execute higher difficulty throws and look a lot more comfortable.  It tells me that Canales has a good system in mind, and had an edge gameplanning wise against Spagnuolo - which is nice to see.  It's a bit to see-saw at times with either going way too pass heavy or way too run heavy, but I think he's finding out what works.  It takes time to have it come together, and sure, I could see regression happen against a better front-7, but this was good for the entire system gelling.    
×
×
  • Create New...