Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mark Carrier Says We Would Have Taken Barron Ahead Of Kuechly


jtnc

Recommended Posts

I doubt he gets fired, but I DO think Marty will be out getting his PR on with "I haven't heard those comments, but as I've said, Luke was the guy we targeted and we're lucky to have him."

Really dumb of Mark to say this regardless, doesn't do any good for anyone. Especially considering Barron was drafted by a rival.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We picked ninth - to pretend there were no players we would have snatched up besides Luke Keulchy is redonkulous. But hey, it's a captain obvious thing, no need to say it out loud right?

But it looks like Carolina was counting on Tampa to draft Claiborne until they fuged it up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think all he revealed is how our board was laid out. Obviously our scouts had a higher rating on Barron than Kuechly. I don't think it's insane we had higher rated players, but Carrier was wrong to say this. Hurney and Richardson run a tight ship and crap like this doesn't fly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Kuechly has a level head and can think about it logically. I mean he was drafted at #9. Obviously there were players rated ahead of him or he would have gone #1, so he was bound to be SOMEONE'S 2nd choice. Maybe even 3rd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...