Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What Is Going To Become Of Nasa? What Purpose Do They Serve?

Iceberg Slim

By Iceberg Slim,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

natty Newbie

natty

Posted
Posted

IMO, NASA is sort of like steak.

It's one of those things that you have to cut out when you are broke. Not saying that you can't ever eat it again, but if your credit card debt is more than your yearly income, it's time to cut it out.

I view it as the complete opposite. Investment in NASA is for the long term. You won't reap the benefits right away, it transcends election cycles. Politicians will spend money where they can get votes from it. During the cold war people would give votes to help defeat the Soviets but today politicians get votes for corporate interests and entitlements. NASA is the nation's 401k and it getting neglected.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mmmbeans Newbie

mmmbeans

Posted
Posted

and that's beyond the very literal NEED to get off this planet. this planet will be destroyed one day, that is a certainty... we would do well to open up other options as soon as possible. if we go the way of the dinosaurs even though we had a space program... joke's on us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest Irv

Guest Irv

Posted
Posted

nasa has been nothing but a cover up to whats really going on in space. out nation has been working with aliens for years now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      Mason Graham Bandwagon

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • Carolina Mike
      Mason Graham Bandwagon

      By Carolina Mike · Posted

      This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
    • Carolina Mike
      2024 College Football Thread

      By Carolina Mike · Posted

      I’m hoping SMU messes it all up and wins out. Imagine the SEC & BI0 would crap themselves trying to “fix” the problem.
×
×
  • Create New...