Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Best Home Defense Shotgun...


Zod

Recommended Posts

I found a nice moss burg 12 gauge at a gunshow. It was the home defense version for $250.

It basically hold 7 + 1 shells, then an extra 5 on the storage sleeve.

It has an interchangeable pistol grip and standard stock.

I keep the stock on it, so my wife (who is a 110 lb blonde) can handle the 12 gauge turkey load.

The first 5 shells, are hardcore turkey buckshot. Then the next few shells are small game shots. I fear shooting through the walls with my kids in the other rooms.

I also bought a LED light to go on the end of it, and a 5x extra shell sleeve holder to go on the stock. It may be overkill, but I guess you must be ready for zombies or New Orleans Looters at all times!

I would post a pic of it, but I am on my iPad, and I cannot post pics from an iPad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The shotgun that will hold the most rounds regardless of gauge is your best bet. Be sure it is automatic. Pumps are only cool in the movies.

I agree/disagree, the pump noise is 90% of its value....but yes, having an automatic shotgun > a pump.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree/disagree, the pump noise is 90% of its value....but yes, having an automatic shotgun > a pump.

I would have one chambered so no pump action to scare anyone. But I do see your point. It could be unloaded and that classic pump sound would most likely scare someone off without having to kill someone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a Remington auto 20 gauge in the closet. 5 round apacity. Woman likes the 20 gauge so she woul't be scared to use it.

20 gauge 6 shot will fug a mother up pretty good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I saw that too--and what you said made sense because there is something like that in the rules--said that he is unlikely to get picked up (and I was not suggesting that we do) and Jones wants to go to a winning team.   After getting beaten to death in NY behind a sub par OL, poor WRs, and brutal fan base, I get it. 
    • True.  Sam and Baker did not do well here but went on to better things under better coaching, circumstances or both.  The real question is, ‘why aren’t the Panthers able to get improved performance out of ‘broken toys’, similar to Minnesota and Tampa? That is a rhetorical question.  I think we know the answer.   [The cultural reference to Pogo dates me, I’ll admit.]
    • Did I mention that he was on worse teams?  Yes.  Do QBs alone win games?  No.  Did Cam, on a much better team with some awesome defenses ever have 2 consecutive winning seasons?  No.  So now you are cherry picking,  If the overall stats are similar, you take a look at him.   I told you that you look at his skill set---but you wanted to tell me that he sucks and mentioned performance.  I just presented performance--and his numbers are very similar to Cam Newton's numbers--a player most call the best Panther QB ever--and I agree.  By the way, Fumbles are evidence of how bad his OL has been--so you are saying that a QB in a situation worse than Cam's who has stats and physical abilities very similar to Cam's should not be given a look when you have Bryce Young at QB?  You are going with that story because you simply talked your way into a corner and now you are trying to save face.  No good GM would do what you suggest because "he sucks."  Sorry, but the facts do not support you.  But no matter what eye-opening details I provide, there are some who are going to go their Google machines to try to find some reason to support an ignorant approach to developing the QB position.  You ignored the similarities to Cam and went cherry picking.  I know what you are doing--but I am only suggesting (as I have stated before) that we bring him in as one of three approaches to resolving the QB issue. Compete with Bryce and draft a QB. Basically, I am suggesting that Jones has the potential to replace Dalton and compete with Young.  He is a battered stock that could get better in a better situation--that is human nature.  Instead, I am called a Daniel Jones lover and superfan.  That is good debate--But a real sign of mature thinking is the inability to LOGICALLY consider alternative perspectives--which is actually a characteristic of intelligence.  Just so you know, I critique and perform research in my job.  I am often amazed at how the numbers do not support my suppositions.  I learned that my impression is often wrong until I look at the data.  In this case, I have considered all the important variables and he should get a shot.  Numbers don't lie--and when you and others resort to twisted name calling directed toward the poster--it verifies my position.  
×
×
  • Create New...