Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Yasinkas Has Us Taking Kuechly


jtnc

Recommended Posts

That assumes that Beason will be best in the middle. There is alot to suggest that if he is not 100%, moving him outside will help him because he will have to cover less ground and concentrate on one side of the field. When he gets back 100%, he can take over if he is the best option. That is why Kuechly is the best option. He can anchor the middle and swing outside if needed. What we want is a versatile player who can come in for either Davis or Beason or both if they have issues.

We did that already and he admitted not likeing the move. said he felt at home in the middle.

Plus you don't move a ALL pro MLB for a rookie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You and Cra never admit you're wrong either. Like I said people had ? about Kuechly speed and athleticism before the Combine. Zac Brown was consider the best LB before the Combine.

I was wrong about Dwayne Jarrett. He didnt just need a chance. BOOYA!!!!

I win!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Bwood

I think Kuechly shouldn't be an option at #9 anymore. If Davis were to play a full 16 game season and show progress, or if Jordan Senn were to show the ability to start ATLEAST until next years draft, we would be dumb to waste our top ten pick on another linebacker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can totally understand if people want Cox over Kuechly. I'll be pumped on draft day if we get Cox, but this hate for Kuechly makes no flippin' sense to me. The fact remains that we have two big question marks for our starting LB corp and no depth behind them. How can anyone be so opposed to picking a potential playmaker in that department? And for those who talk about him being a late tackler after the ballcarrier is 5 yards past the LOS, have you even watched his tape?? Because that idea is COMPLETE BS. Hell, I had Cox as number one on my wishlist, but after reading the stupid posts on here, I kinda want Kuechly more, JUST so I can see how y'all respond when he starts pooping on NFL talent.

Haters gonna hate, I guess...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Kuechly shouldn't be an option at #9 anymore. If Davis were to play a full 16 game season and show progress, or if Jordan Senn were to show the ability to start ATLEAST until next years draft, we would be dumb to waste our top ten pick on another linebacker.

If Davis? If Senn? Dont we know the answer to such questions.

If we draft a CB, DE, WR, DT at 9.... We still should consider making a move for a OLB like David in the 2nd. LB is a position of need.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And Beason had only 8 his final season in college football...thanks for playing.

The point wasn't to compare him to Beason, it was to compare him to where our needs were. We need backfield penetration, and people tried to argue Kuechly was awesome at that with no supporting evidence.

We need QB pressure. Not another Beason. We already have one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The point wasn't to compare him to Beason, it was to compare him to where our needs were. We need backfield penetration, and people tried to argue Kuechly was awesome at that with no supporting evidence.

We need QB pressure. Not another Beason. We already have one.

we could draft 2 cam newtons
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Many times it is our OLB's that cover the tight ends while the MLB covers the middle of the field. Not sure there is less running on the outside.

It is a matter of how much of the field he has to cover on every play. If he plays middle he has to run both directions. If he plays outside he has to play just one. As for him playing tight ends, that is true he has to keep up with them. If he can't he becomes a 2 down linebacker much like Ryans was last year and the reason Houston traded him to Philly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The point wasn't to compare him to Beason, it was to compare him to where our needs were. We need backfield penetration, and people tried to argue Kuechly was awesome at that with no supporting evidence.

We need QB pressure. Not another Beason. We already have one.

If that is the criteria we need to replace all the linebackers. None are great at blitzing or tackles for losses and everyone knows it can't be coached. We can get a D linemen later in the draft who can rush the passer since Cox will be gone at 9.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...