Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Name Me One Dominant Dt Under 300


Yaboychris28

Recommended Posts

Exactly, you can't. All of the dominating defensive Tackles are well above 300. Wilfork, Ngata, Suh,Williams, Raji, Docket etc. Fletcher Cox will be a solid D-tackle but not an impact player which means he is not worthy of the #9 pick. If we go D-tackle with our 1st pick, i would be more comfortable picking Brockers because of his size, frame, and upside. IMO the pick should be Coples if he is still on the board. Coples could provide more interior pass rush than Cox will ever be able to, plus you can move him to the outside. Fletcher Cox is a jack of all trades but a master of none. We need an impact player that can step in immediatly and improve this defense instantly, Cox is not that guy. All of you Cox fanboys need to hop off the bandwagon and actually think in what areas is Cox better than Coples.

inb4 Cox plays harder blah blah

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It is sad. I have people chimping out over the suggestion that Huddle consensus has been better than our franchise at draft evaluations but, quite frankly, it has been. It's not just sad, it's maddening. How is this possible??
    • Great observation. Previous GMs could have improved their draft results by just opening up the huddle. It’s sad. 
    • I'm not opposed to keeping him depending on the money. If he's going to count against the cap anyway (which the void year does) it's not the worst move unless an extension significantly raises his cap number. Even if it's just a 1-year deal that pays him a little more than what he's already on the books for. When he's been on the field he's been really good, but the issue is obviously injuries. I will say, having Corbett back as the starter would also give us good depth since Cade Mays can move into the backup role. That could be key if (more likely when) Brady Christensen leaves. Hard to say right now without seeing the potential terms of any new deal. In all honesty, though, if we're going to spend money on re-signing an OL I'd prefer trying to keep Brady Christensen. He's extremely valuable depth given he can play literally every position on the OL at a serviceable level or better, including center.
×
×
  • Create New...