Madden Cover Vote Finals: Supercam Vs. Megatron

[tiger7_88]

Michelle Beadle is in need of a vigorous GF'ing.

Just sayin'.

[CarolinaPride5]

Voted for Cam and hoping he wins it! If you didn't vote for him... Shame on you.

[Mattiekrome]

Oh dear what to do! I've voted against Cam every round up til now, but now I want him to win!

Do I still vote against Cam, and hope that theres some type of reverse karma thing going on that is causing him to win every round against my vote, or do I vote FOR him (now that I really want him to win) and possibly Jinx him into losing because I voted for him?

[PhillyB]

this thread is a great litmus test for finding out whose mental processes are still mired in the dark ages

[Darknight]

Would the pill allow me to achieve one of the goals I've had since I was a little kid?

Eta: If I offered you a job that could bring you fame & fortune but there would also be a high chance of you having serious health and/or pain problems from age 35 on would you take it?

No. I wouldn't take it. What's good with wealth if you don't have your health to spend the wealth? No. I wouldn't take it.

[emhoward]

If the Red Sox can win a world series....there is no such thing as a curse.

[emhoward]

Or the curse was broken lol

[Wyank]

Cam will win...Why, because in this bizzaro world of the Madden curse, there are more Lion fans than Panther fans.

But there is more Packer fans than Lion fans who would love to curse Megatron since they face him twice a year.

[The NFL Shield At Midfield]

[SgtJoo]

The Texas sharpshooter fallacy often arises when a person has a large amount of data at their disposal, but only focuses on a small subset of that data. Random chance may give all the elements in that subset some kind of common property (or pair of common properties, when arguing for correlation). If the person fails to account for the likelihood of finding some subset in the large data with some common property strictly by chance alone, that person is likely committing a Texas Sharpshooter fallacy.

[Mattiekrome]

The Texas sharpshooter fallacy often arises when a person has a large amount of data at their disposal, but only focuses on a small subset of that data. Random chance may give all the elements in that subset some kind of common property (or pair of common properties, when arguing for correlation). If the person fails to account for the likelihood of finding some subset in the large data with some common property strictly by chance alone, that person is likely committing a Texas Sharpshooter fallacy.

That looked like something a spambot would post... halfway expecting that link to forward me to a page where I could buy cheap high quality jerseys

[SgtJoo]

That looked like something a spambot would post... halfway expecting that link to forward me to a page where I could buy cheap high quality jerseys

For some reason it didn't format properly, heh.

Better now?

[Mage]

What if Cam gets injured anyway? What will the people who didn't vote for him say?

[rodeo]

If he doesn't win and gets injured or sucks anyways, remind me to bump this.