Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Trading James Anderson?


Sam Mills Fan

Recommended Posts

You mean there are some that think he his human.......not this more than a man, less than a god type being.

But yeah, trading your only decent LB who isn't coming on a major injury is rah-tarded. Even if we draft a LB.

Yea and the ones that think he is human understand that people can rehab an injury and comeback. Then there are people like yourself. Also I put it was a crazy idea and it is for the fact that Davis probably won't recover after 3 surgeries.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We need at least 4 or 5 starting quality linebackers who can come in for a few games or longer if we have injuries plus we need several for depth. Anderson is the cheapest of the 3 starting linebackers and is a great value. We have waited for years for him to develop to the point of being a good starter. Tel me again why we would trade him????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea and the ones that think he is human understand that people can rehab an injury and comeback. Then there are people like yourself. Also I put it was a crazy idea and it is for the fact that Davis probably won't recover after 3 surgeries.

I can't recall a single poster claiming Beason can't comeback from that injury. Some question how long it will take him to reach the level he once was at....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't recall a single poster claiming Beason can't comeback from that injury. Some question how long it will take him to reach the level he once was at....

Stop trying to reason with him. The strategy he uses is to ascribe extreme positions to anyone who has doubts about Beason's rehab as if that fortifies his position. Any reasonable poster hopes for the best but knows it is foolhardy not to prepare for the worst. Otherwise we end up with a possible reprise of last season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Theory I came up with this morning: with all this chatter about us liking Luke Kuechly so much, is there a chance they're thinking of trading James Anderson? If we take Kuechly, it would make no sense unless we moved one of the guys there currently and the only one with real trade value we would be willing to part with is Anderson for the right price. I would hate this, but does anyone else feel this theory makes sense?

No. Kuechly is insurance for Thomas Davis, not so they can trade Anderson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...