Former Taints Coach Pegged As Possible Bounty Whistleblower

[Who Dat Pat]

Your sig is so incredibly IRONIC right now! Lol

[panthers55]

Your sig is so incredibly IRONIC right now! Lol

Your sig is so incredibly IRONIC right now! Lol

Actually it was designed for idiots like you who can't tell the difference between a rumor and fact. Who can't distinguish between an opinion and indisputable evidence. What you consistently think is fact is actually an opinion, allegation, report or their unsubstantiated information. In your rush to prove your point you take information that is not proven and present it as such. Instead of validating your point it just shows further evidence that you are a troll and are totally unreliable. In fact when I see you post something I am usually inclined to believe just the opposite of what you say. After all your track record is that you are wrong on just about everything.

[Who Dat Pat]

Last attempt and then I give up. The below was a story you created based on the two sentence summary of the 10 minute interview by Donnes. When I point out to you exactly what information has been released and that it doesn't support any of your conclusions in any way, shape, or form ( the point I was making ) you go off on this tangent saying how the interview is heresay and not fact etc etc.

Bottom line, nothing you said in your post below is supported by the " heresay", "rumor", "one guys word", "unsubstantiated story" from the OP article. You are arguing so strongly against the validity of the information released, yet that has nothing to do with the point I was making, the fact you took that same unsubstantiated info and went further with it to come up with the below scenario.

No one missed it. I wouldn't put it past Payton or Williams to be dick bags and try and blackball someone. Maybe he knew about the bounty and complained about it and was fired for it. Just the kind of low life scumbag thing that Wiliams and Payton would do. Serves them right it came back to bite them. Otherwise you would let him go and say decent things and let him move on. The more I hear about Payton the more I can see what an A hole he was.

[panthers55]

Last attempt and then I give up. The below was a story you created based on the two sentence summary of the 10 minute interview by Donnes. When I point out to you exactly what information has been released and that it doesn't support any of your conclusions in any way, shape, or form ( the point I was making ) you go off on this tangent saying how the interview is heresay and not fact etc etc.

Bottom line, nothing you said in your post below is supported by the " heresay", "rumor", "one guys word", "unsubstantiated story" from the OP article. You are arguing so strongly against the validity of the information released, yet that has nothing to do with the point I was making, the fact you took that same unsubstantiated info and went further with it to come up with the below scenario.

Are you really that stupid? That was a video where allegations were made. The bottom line was that no documents were shown, no definitive proof was shown that indicates who was the whistle blower or whose information was the causal factor in the investigation being reopened. It wasn't the 2 sentence summary I was referring to, but after watching the video I came to the conclusion that the so called proof was innuendo and accusation. There were 50,000 pages of documentation that went into this investigation and this video alleges that it was a disgruntled ex-employee that blew the whistle. Again until that is collaborated by someone in the league office or there is a string of documentation that substantiates this allegation to be true, it is an allegation and rumor. Even the video contradicts itself. If the evidence is supposedly not very convincing then the whistleblower would be ignored and discredited right off the bat so the consequence of the whistleblowing would be negligible. So then this would not be the reason the investigation moved forward and he would not be the whistleblower simply a disgruntled employee with discredited and useless information which would be ignored.

So you either have a video which is heresay and not substantiated or if accurate indicates the information presented to the league was unreliable and that it would have not triggered the investigation reopening since it came from a prejudiced and unreliable source.

Which one is it?????

[TNPanther]

Alicejandra you are dumb.

[MadHatter]

The difference between you and I is that I am basing what I write on listiening to the actual entire interview by the filmmaker and you are basing your info on the two sentence summary someone wrote about that 10 minute interview.

No Pat....the difference between you and 55 is that he is a well spoken and intelligent individual....while you are nothing but a pathetic little fugtard with an IQ barely high enough to tie his own shoes.

[MadHatter]

Last attempt and then I give up.

We can ONLY HOPE that you give up and slink away into the cess pool that you call a hometown.

[PhillyB]

at the end of the day your team got exposed for the selfish assholes they are from top to bottom and goodell is spanking that ass for it. anything else is just semantics.

[pOpCoRnPoPpEr]

The man can never be trusted again. He's lucky to even have a job at Uconn. If he is indeed the rat i see Uconn finding a way to fire him in the near future.

[panthers55]

The man can never be trusted again. He's lucky to even have a job at Uconn. If he is indeed the rat i see Uconn finding a way to fire him in the near future.

What a load of BS. This isn't the mob. Why should he be expected to lie and deceive the NFL commissioner like Loomis, Peyton and now Brees with his distortion about no bounties for injury. I can tell you that teams that do that to the NCAA get slammed as well when they are caught. I wouldn't work for an organization where I have to perjure myself and lie to keep a job. If whistleblowing about a corrupt practice costs me my job, I wouldn't want to work for such a crummy organization.

Assuming he was the whistleblower which hasn't been proven nor is it clear that his allegations were causal in reopening the investigation.