Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hypothetical Trade


HeatCheck

  

66 members have voted

  1. 1. How willing would you pursue a trade like this?

    • Very Willing
      26
    • Somewhat Willing
      15
    • Unsure
      6
    • Not too willing
      11
    • Not willing at all
      8


Recommended Posts

Let me get this straight, we'd lose our first for 2 seconds? If so, hell no.

No, I'm not that stupid.

We'd lose our 1st (9) and our 2nd

and

We'd gain 2 lower firsts (e.g. 17 & 21) and a third.

The reason I pose this question is because I feel like there's a lot more value in 2 mid/lower first rounders vs who is going to be available at 9. But if you feel like losing a 2nd is too much just to pick up two first rounders than I would understand. This poll isn't meant to see if you think it's fair or not, because this is most certainly a realistic trade. It's more to judge the value of the trade and how comfortable you'd be selecting at these spots considering where players should fall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Clearly, but use your best judgement based on what players are going to be there. I think many would pass on this if Claiborne was there. But I think in any other situation I'd trade down, that's just me though.

If we are getting the Patriots #27 and #31, then No, I would pass on the trade.

If we are getting the Browns two 1st's then I would be all over it.

It completely depends on the picks we trade for..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, I'm not that stupid.

We'd lose our 1st (9) and our 2nd

and

We'd gain 2 lower firsts (e.g. 17 & 21) and a third.

The reason I pose this question is because I feel like there's a lot more value in 2 mid/lower first rounders vs who is going to be available at 9. But if you feel like losing a 2nd is too much just to pick up two first rounders than I would understand. This poll isn't meant to see if you think it's fair or not, because this is most certainly a realistic trade. It's more to judge the value of the trade and how comfortable you'd be selecting at these spots considering where players should fall.

Thanks for the clarification.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't do this because our high second rounder is almost as good as a first. there is going to be very little drop off in talent between say picks 25-40.

only way i would do this is if we got this deal from the bengals for #17 and #21. could pick jenkins/kirkpatrick and one of high ceiling DTs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...