Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Top 3 Players For #9 Pick


bLACKpANTHER

Recommended Posts

I dont like either of these guys at #9. Kuelchy is talented and has a lot of potential but it happens that we have a very talented and highly paid MLB under contract. Cox is pretty good but at most his immediate impact/upgrade would be minor to what we already have at DT. From the list above I take Kirkpatrick, Gilmore or Coples

We have a very talented and highly paid coming off a serious injury MLB under contract. I hope he is 100%. My heart wants that, but my head tells me he'll be more like 80-85%. Besides, Kuechly has the ability to play every LB position. With Davis a major ? and Beason almost certainly not going to be Beastly, our biggest need, despite what everyone says, is a quality starting LB - especially given the defensive scheme we run. Who is the best one available?

Cox is, imo, the best DT available. If our LB core is not going to be particularly strong, we need to take a shot on a DT to get push up the middle. I think Cox is the best for the job.

I don't think we need to take a CB at 9, even Claiborne. There are 2 rounds of quality CB's and we have Hogan who is basically a rookie but has shown promise. I wouldn't pick Coples with any first round pick. He is supposed to be the best pass-rusher in the draft and the guy had 7.5 sacks last year, including 2 vs. James Madison and 2 vs. Duke. Other than those two games, he had 3.5 sacks against E. Carolina, Louisville, and a weak ACC. I'm not using a #9 pick on that guy, sorry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we didn't want him as a starter, why did we let Wharton walk this time, and keep Hangartner?

Also, the Bills didn't release him because he was bad, they released him because he was a cap causality.

Trust me, Hangartner is a fantastic offensive lineman, and is better than any other option we have on the team right now at the Guard position.

No need to keep going back and fourth with him. Hangman was the starting LG as soon as he got a 3 year deal and Warton was let go. He can play both guard position and center. He is starting quality.

We aren't drafting Decastro. They really like Gary williams and Byron Bell. Then Mike Pollack and Zack Brown are depht.

When was the last time a team drafted a guard in the top 10? Don't worry I'll wait................

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reilly is a reach...in some opinions. My reason for taking OT first is that i think we have to solve the Otah situation. Address it imediatly while Otah still has value and lock up a starter for the next 5yr so we are not shifting guys around when he is most likely to get hurt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reilly is a reach...in some opinions. My reason for taking OT first is that i think we have to solve the Otah situation. Address it imediatly while Otah still has value and lock up a starter for the next 5yr so we are not shifting guys around when he is most likely to get hurt.

Byron Bell and they just got Cambell in the Goody trade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we drafted soley by position of need we would be taking players that aren't worth a top 10 pick. BPA is the name of the game and also Hurney's best friend. We have a top 10 pick, we might as well use it like one.

If we went by your method:

If we want a CB, we would take Dre Kirkpatrick at #9. <--- late first rounder, might as well see what's there in the 2nd

If we want a DE, we would take Coples at #9. <--- LOL

If we want a DT, we would take Cox at #9. <--- this one's good, we can wait and see if Worthy/Still is in the 2nd tho

If we're gonna reach, we might as well trade down for a 7th rounder and a reacharound

I honestly don't see Kirkpatrick falling out of the top 15... But we will see. CB is such a premium position with the way team's are throwing the ball. So #9 I think would be decent... Coples at 9 is not a laughing matter. Many people see him going in the top 10, and as he is the top DE on the board with possibly the highest potential, I don't see how you are laughing.

Then lastly, "if we are gonna reach, we might as well trade down for a 7th rounder and a reacharound".... A hyperbole to be sure, but really not even accurate to what I was saying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...