Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Top 3 Players For #9 Pick


bLACKpANTHER

Recommended Posts

Yes, we all want Claiborne overall - But of the projected players to still be available at #9, who are your top 3:

2) Quinton Coples

1) Fletcher Cox

Michael Floyd

Stephon Gilmore

3) Dre Kirkpatrick

Luke Kuechly

Dontari Poe

Riley Reiff

Out of those listed...

Luke

Coples

Floyd

Comparable DT can be grabbed in the 2nd to those listed. First 2 are BPA on D.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1) Coples. I just think a DE is more important the DT at this point... Especially since I think the DT class is so deep...

2) Fletcher Cox. I know I just said DT is deep, but based on need, Coples outdoes him. If someone could prove that he was a safer pick, I might go with him at 1.

3) It's so open.... Floyd or Kirkpatrick would probably be my choice, despite the Kirkpatrick pick being a slight reach by 5 picks. But when you like someone, you go get em. I also know Floyd seems like a "luxury pick", but he would possibly be the most talented left.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just had Thanksgiving meal with a couple dozen family and friends. I lucked out and got one of the smoked turkey legs. Stuffing, mashed taters and gravy, green bean casserole, sweet potato casserole, kale, smoked ham, chicken and rice, corn, lima beans, cranberry sauce, and great people. My brother got his guitar out and we got to singing. Lots of actual conversations with people I hardly  ever get to see, haven't seen in a while, or who I never met before. Just a great moment to remember.
    • 3-8 would be a higher win percentage than 3-9
    • Same... With the personnel the Niners had, that defense could have been historically good in the right hands. Under Wilks they were certainly good, they didn't quite rise to that level. Honestly, I see Wilks kinda like I see Rivera: fantastic person, decent head coach. Skill wise, phenomenal DB coach, so-so DC. His greatest strength is his leadership. Hard to find many better in that department. In the Xs and Os / execution area though, not as good. Bottom Line: Wilks is the sort of coach that needs a staff that excels in those aspects of the game where he's weaker. But, like Rivera, I don't know that he scouts assistants very well. That as much as anything might be why he's not in the NFL now.
×
×
  • Create New...