Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Am I Wrong For Thinking...


bLACKpANTHER

Recommended Posts

that Luke Kuechly will be a bust at #9, based only on "he's a white LB"

now I know Dan Connor did very well here, but we can all admit- he was no Beason- not that there are many Beasons out there- but, we can also say Connor was no James Anderson either.

i loved the pick of Connor and where we drafted him in the 3rd round- i just have a problem with Luechly being our #1 pick with guys like Coples and Cox still on the board..

Am I wrong? anyone else feel this way?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the only "criticism" of him is that he's white, then yeah, that's a racist sentiment. If you want to say he's not as athletic as other LB's because he's not as athletic, that's one thing... but just because he's white is not a reason.

Just because you're athletic doesn't mean you'll be good... just because you're not as athletic doesn't mean you won't be...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dont worry he would be a bust if he was purple. Dude is a avg MLB that is this years Gabbert in terms of hype.

Yeah, pretty average... :huh:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He'll be a "bust" because no matter how good he is you can't justify taking an OLB who can't rush the passer at that spot when we have pressing needs elsewhere.

It would have been like taking Dareus last year.

Sure, he's good, but his impact would have been minimal in the grand scheme of things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He'll be a "bust" because no matter how good he is you can't justify taking an OLB who can't rush the passer at that spot when we have pressing needs elsewhere.

It would have been like taking Dareus last year.

Sure, he's good, but his impact would have been minimal in the grand scheme of things.

He's an ILB...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://knowt.com/note/19f0110a-ce77-4955-8830-a3846fc39663/Cmo-llamar-a-Sky-Chile-Telfono-24by https://knowt.com/note/19f0110a-ce77-4955-8830-a3846fc39663/Cmo-llamar-a-Sky-Chile-Telfono-24by https://knowt.com/note/19f0110a-ce77-4955-8830-a3846fc39663/Cmo-llamar-a-Sky-Chile-Telfono-24by https://knowt.com/note/19f0110a-ce77-4955-8830-a3846fc39663/Cmo-llamar-a-Sky-Chile-Telfono-24by https://knowt.com/note/19f0110a-ce77-4955-8830-a3846fc39663/Cmo-llamar-a-Sky-Chile-Telfono-24by https://knowt.com/note/19f0110a-ce77-4955-8830-a3846fc39663/Cmo-llamar-a-Sky-Chile-Telfono-24by https://knowt.com/note/19f0110a-ce77-4955-8830-a3846fc39663/Cmo-llamar-a-Sky-Chile-Telfono-24by V   https://knowt.com/note/19f0110a-ce77-4955-8830-a3846fc39663/Cmo-llamar-a-Sky-Chile-Telfono-24byhttps://knowt.com/note/19f0110a-ce77-4955-8830-a3846fc39663/Cmo-llamar-a-Sky-Chile-Telfono-24byhttps://knowt.com/note/19f0110a-ce77-4955-8830-a3846fc39663/Cmo-llamar-a-Sky-Chile-Telfono-24by https://knowt.com/note/19f0110a-ce77-4955-8830-a3846fc39663/Cmo-llamar-a-Sky-Chile-Telfono-24by https://knowt.com/note/19f0110a-ce77-4955-8830-a3846fc39663/Cmo-llamar-a-Sky-Chile-Telfono-24by
    • It's been a tradition of mine in FF I ignore the name of the RB and draft them based on the oline. For years, Dallas was the elite line. Now it's Philly. It's been plug and play behind those lines. Investing those day 2 picks on the interior line allows you to take a day 3 RB and get day 2 results. 
    • So we have Tremble, JT Sanders, and the Thomas - Franks is the 4th but mainly just for Special teams.  Sanders is a TE - on paper, on the roster, physically, and on the field.  If you are trying to claim because he is a good receiver and not a great blocker he is not a TE then you have not watched very much football, like at all.  Cause that is how a ton of TE's come into the league.  Literally the #1, most common area for improvement for the TE group every single year - especially the top 5 TE's. And for the 1 millionth time, for the people in the back - drafting BPA is absolutely not a rule that anyone follows.  Not a single team.  They always factor in multiple things, BPA being one of them but not the most important almost ever.  It is an evaluation of need, personal evaluation, pick position/who drafts before your next pick, trade offers, free agents possible.  They don't follow it for good reason. Perfect example - Bo Nix.  He was not rated anywhere near #12 by just about anyone - including the broncos.  But they drafted him because they NEEDED a QB, liked him, and had no 2nd RD pick.  They outright said that.  Do you think they regret the pick?  They drafted 100% for need and pick position. Example #2 - Bijan.  Atlanta drafted BPA.  He is amazing, had a great 2 years so far.  They were 7-10 for 2 straight years prior.  And the 2 years after they have been 7-10 & 8-9.  Do you think they made the right decision?  By the way they also spent the #4 overall pick on Pitts, a Generational TE, and he/they suck.  I'd imagine Falcon fans would not agree with your BPA theory since they missed out on Chase, Waddle, Parsons, Horn, PSII, DeVonta Smith - all positions of need in 2021. BPA is A criteria, but not THE criteria.
×
×
  • Create New...