Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Lol @ The Browns...


Recommended Posts

http://www.nfl.com/draft/story/09000d5d827e7b2d/article/report-browns-to-visit-with-tannehill-despite-backing-mccoy

Uh...I thought they said McCoy was their guy? If that were remotely true, why would they have Tannehill visit?

I'm going out on a limb here and say they are genuinely interested in Tannehill. I hope they take him too. For obvious reasons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

McCoy hasn't showed anything, well for me anyway, that states he's starting level. Don't blame them if look at QB's in the draft.

If they do take Tannehill, then the chain reactions will fall almost perfectly for the panthers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The wage cap pretty much throws everything we know about the top half of the draft out the window. 2 years ago Tannerhill probably is a 2nd round pick. Now top 5 isn't out of the question. God I love the NFL. Personally I think he's this years Gabert (which to toot my own horn I was one of the few that said he was at best a 2nd round prospect) but who knows. I'd bet he is gone before we pick either to them or the Phins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

McCoy hasn't showed anything, well for me anyway, that states he's starting level. Don't blame them if look at QB's in the draft.

If they do take Tannehill, then the chain reactions will fall almost perfectly for the panthers.

How do you figure? How does the Browns taking Tannehill at 4 help us at all?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The wage cap pretty much throws everything we know about the top half of the draft out the window. 2 years ago Tannerhill probably is a 2nd round pick. Now top 5 isn't out of the question. God I love the NFL. Personally I think he's this years Gabert (which to toot my own horn I was one of the few that said he was at best a 2nd round prospect) but who knows. I'd bet he is gone before we pick either to them or the Phins.

I concur. He's very similar to Gabba gabba.

As far as why this would help us, it's simple. Bucs would have to chose Richardson. Meaning Claiborne would drop to us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.nfl.com/d...e-backing-mccoy

Uh...I thought they said McCoy was their guy? If that were remotely true, why would they have Tannehill visit?

I'm going out on a limb here and say they are genuinely interested in Tannehill. I hope they take him too. For obvious reasons.

It very well be gamesmanship.

Convice other teams that you are interested in Tannehill....therefore any team really interested in Tannehill may think they need to trade up with you to get him.

Not really that hard to understand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nah I wanna see these NFL evaluators talking about his prospects at WR aren't good because I would LOVE to see thier explanations 
    • You do realize that raw stats don't make someone a better or worse player, right? To begin with, the last time I checked, 1,319 is more yards than 1,258, so T-Mac had more yards (but I'll forgive you as a typo there and say you meant catches lol), but that's before even factoring in that Hunter did his in 13 games vs 12 for T-Mac because Arizona didn't make a bowl game. It's also completely ignoring the team around each player.  If you think Hunter having the 8th place finisher in the Heisman voting at QB isn't going to result in helping his top WRs stats, then you're sticking your head in the sand to purposefully not see it. Hunter's QB had 353 completions for 4,134 yards and 37 TDs vs T-Mac's QB who had 260 completions for 2,958 yards and 18 TDs. But sure, let's rank NFL prospects by their stats and say the guy with more catches and TDs is the better prospect.  So on that note, I now change my mind, T-Mac is no longer the best WR in the draft, it's Nick Nash who had 104 rec, 1,382 yards, and 16 TDs, all numbers better than Hunter's... because that's how this is done, right? As I've said before, if someone wants to like a player better than someone else that's totally fair, but come with real reasons, talk about their play, but to talk about things like stats as your reasoning, when you ignore the obvious and massive flaws in using those stats in that way, just makes you look dumb.
    • Nah you don't go out and put up the numbers he did without being able to run routes dude is a football junky so he works on his craft he isn’t THAT much more athletic than other players to just be able to go out and do whatever and succeed at that level 
×
×
  • Create New...