Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Lets Say We Get Morris Claiborne... And Zach Brown Drops To Us In The 2Nd...


thunderraiden

Recommended Posts

Lets say we get Morris Claiborne due to circumstances... and Zach Brown drops to us in the 2nd... Do we gamble with our DT situation holding up under Ron Edwards and sophomore DT's with an offseason or do we ignore the incredible chance to instantly replace Thomas Davis with his home grown clone and just blindly take best available DT?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There will be some great DE's available at our 2nd round pick.. it would be very hard to pass one up. I could pass on Zach Brown, even though he would fit our scheme perfectly. Pass rush is more important.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Walterfootball.cOm has morris claiborne dropping to us due to cleveland being forced to select ryan tannehill and tampa going with trent richardson. We also have the option of trading back should the Buc select M Claiborne and Richardson drops to us at 10.

Walterfootball also has zach brown falling pass us and us selecting Jerel Worthy DT from michigan state, which isnt a bad pick. But given the option to replace t davis with homegrown talent in the second... Shouldnt we take it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

well you definitely take Claiborne, I'd only take Brown if the DE/DT's there are not first round to early second round grade, in other words Brown is the best pick available at a position of need

Interesting side question, not that he will drop after yesterday's 40, but if Kendall Wright is there in the second do you take him

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://support.google.com/edu/classroom/thread/336663817?hl=en&sjid=5397057636093527297-NC https://support.google.com/edu/classroom/thread/336663817?hl=en&sjid=5397057636093527297-NC https://support.google.com/edu/classroom/thread/336663817?hl=en&sjid=5397057636093527297-NC https://support.google.com/edu/classroom/thread/336663817?hl=en&sjid=5397057636093527297-NC https://support.google.com/edu/classroom/thread/336663817?hl=en&sjid=5397057636093527297-NC
    • If there's a prospect who looks strong on the field but has the question marks, makes sense to bring them in and see if they are indeed a nutjob or not.  Especially if they couldn't get a good sense in limited time to meet him at the combine.  Randy Mueller has talked about it before -- many GMs don't just use these top-30s to validate the guys they already love.  Although we seem to do that and kind of show our cards a lot lol.   But to the point, if they love tape, have met enough coaches/teammates and talked to them at the bowls/workouts, many teams don't need to wine and dine and get to know them.   There's certain guys who get to know regional scouts, GMs and position coaches starting mid-college season last year.    On the flipside, there's the wildcards who aren't privy to developing relationships with the pro-community while in school, have bad reps, and teams need to dig a bit further into it.  A top-30 becomes a good measuring stick for those teams think could be a stellar fit but are unsure on who the guy actually is - which matters a ton at the end of the day.  Organizational fit has so much more weight than let on and is why these drafts after the first few picks get so all over the map.  
    • https://x.com/rapsheet/status/1909256874043597020?s=46&t=xeIgh_-Vr2aKxBkBJdfnKA   CB Quincy Riley 
×
×
  • Create New...