D-Will or Stewart trade?

[ed bell]

Dude, Stewart is our running back of the future. Dwill can get cut for all I care.

Since when do we NEED to trade either one anyways? Am I missing something?

We don't need to trade either one...but why on earth would cutting D'Will make any sense whatsoever? I get it, some fans love Stewart and want D'Will sent out to pasture. The "30 year old RB's suck" reasoning is thrown out there all the time.

Funny things about the D'Will situation:

a) people expected him to get injured in 2011...he stayed healthy

.b )people expected him to get shown up by Stewart...they both did everything expected of them.

c) he's now in year two of his contract and is still 28 years old...re-structure him after 2012 and on we go.

[megadeth078]

talk about running yards all you want, I do think he was shown up by Stewart.

Stewart was in more snaps and a lot of plays would have to get removed from our playbook if we only had D-will.

Stewart is the only reason the screen pass made a return to Carolina.

[Pantherman]

I wheather see Dwill go. Stewart is to valueble to us.

[CollegePanther]

I love Deangelo, but how much money we have invested in him would be much better used somewhere else. J-Stew and Mike Tolbert would be a strong backfield still

[jtnc]

Or MAYBE we're gonna sign him and then release d-will?

[Ken]

Bullshit, story is bullshit. -_-

[mick eye]

My bad did not event mention Tolbert. I think a running attack of Cam, J-Stew and Yogi would be awesome. I say sign Mike !.!

Tolbert is similar to Stewart that he is a bigger back with receiving skills and ideal examples of Newton's Law. Snoop + Yogi. Add a shifty speed back with BETTER receiving skills and you got a KILLA RBC.

[AceMan]

If we sign Tolbert, prepare for a possible HUGE s***storm...cuz we would definitely be getting rid of Stewart over D-Will

[megadeth078]

If we sign Tolbert, prepare for a possible HUGE s***storm...cuz we would definitely be getting rid of Stewart over D-Will

That is so false it hurts. If it really did mean that, we wouldn't sign Tolbert.

I didn't mean to thank you btw. zod fix this poo! i can't handle having the thanks on the wrong side

[AceMan]

That is so false it hurts. If it really did mean that, we wouldn't sign Tolbert.

I didn't mean to thank you btw. zod fix this poo! i can't handle having the thanks on the wrong side

Listen...on the off-chance we sign Tolbert, we will NOT pay 5 mil. just to cut D-will.

Stewart is way better trade bait. No matter how much it hurts you to think about it, he would definitely be more likely to leave

[Catalyst]

This seems more likely to be a typo or just plain bad reporting to me

[Ivan The Awesome]

Tolbert? Really? We don't need another fuging running back.. Get Garay, Castillo for pete's sake. Try adding a pass rusher, if there's any left.

[The Special One]

DWill's contract and age will not interest any NFL teams. JStew on the other hand could interest a team like the Bengals, who happen to have 2 1st round picks this year.

[Herbert The Love Bug]

more like we will get rid of Goodson