Good reading on "Bountygate"

[Mr. Scot]

Of course nothing came out of it because the Panthers lost and really have not been a threat to win the Super Bowl since. When you are a real winning organization that actually has won a Super Bowl without using illegal drugs or trying to gain an unfair advantage you get put under a microscope. The fact that any Panther fan would judge anything the Saints allegedly have done after having a team go to a Super Bowl only because of their rampant steroid usage is not only laughable but it is pathetic as well.

Ah but the Saints did cheat to gain an unfair advantage, and their leadership has admitted it.

Add in that Payton and Benson are so scared of what's going to happen that they're in New York begging for mercy (but probably won't get it).

But hey, maybe if you post that same article you quoted without attribution - which makes you a plagiarist by the way (look it up) - a dozen more times or so, maybe Roger Goodell will read it and take pity on the Saints.

That, or maybe all of us will just continue to sit here and laugh at you while you sit there all butthurt and pissed off trying to get back at us with all the effectiveness of a five-year-old throwing a tantrum.

I'd say option two is more likely :D

[rico6]

According to an investigative report posted on the Charlotte Observer's Web site on Sunday, a number of Carolina Panthers used a vast quantity and tremendous variety of performance-enhancing drugs during the team's 2004 Super Bowl season.

The newspaper looked at medical records and court documents released in conjunction with the federal steroids case against Dr. James Shortt, who last month was sentenced to one year and one day in prison for distributing steroids and human growth hormone.

"Several of [the players] were using disturbing, particularly alarmingly high amounts with high dosages for long durations -- some in combinations," said Dr. Gary Wadler, who prepared a report for the U.S. Attorney's Office that was used to prosecute Shortt. "This wasn't just a passing flirtation with these prohibited substances. When I see [prescriptions] 'renewed five times,' I say, 'What are you trying to accomplish?' "

Players' names were blacked out on Wadler's report, but the Observer reported that six Panthers -- and three of the five starting offensive linemen from the Super Bowl team -- were taking performance enhancers. And many reported adverse reactions.

Why are you spamming that like an idiot?

[breezing2anotherSB]

Ah but the Saints did cheat to gain an unfair advantage, and their leadership has admitted it.

Add in that Payton and Benson are so scared of what's going to happen that they're in New York begging for mercy (but probably won't get it).

But hey, maybe if you post that same article you quoted without attribution - which makes you a plagiarist by the way (look it up) - a dozen more times or so, maybe Roger Goodell will read it and take pity on the Saints.

That, or maybe all of us will just continue to sit here and laugh at you while you sit there all butthurt and pissed off trying to get back at us with all the effectiveness of a five-year-old throwing a tantrum.

I'd say option two is more likely :D

Yep an according to your logic you would say that me pasting an article is as bad as taking illegal banned substances.

[Mr. Scot]

Yep an according to your logic you would say that me pasting an article is as bad as taking illegal banned substances.

Well, technically there's no law against not being very bright, being bad at forum trolling and getting laughed at by the people you're trying to upset, so I guess you've got nothing to worry about :thumbsup:

[Frizzy350]

Yep an according to your logic you would say that me pasting an article is as bad as taking illegal banned substances.

nobody here is defending the players that were on our team who were taking banned substances.

mr scot has not been taking banned substances.

you have been plagiarizing material.

one of u is committing a crime.

[Mr. Scot]

nobody here is defending the players that were on our team who were taking banned substances.

mr scot has not been taking banned substances.

you have been plagiarizing material.

one of u is committing a crime.

Metamucil is still on the approved list, right?

As long as that's true... :Angel_anim: