Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Which division do you think is the toughest?


Cat Fanboy

Recommended Posts

I am really enjoying seeing more and more parity in the teams. No longer are the Browns, Bengals, and Lions check mark wins.

Any given Sunday right?

Was reading an article last year about how the NFC North was the 'toughest division'. Good article - but it got me thinking which is going to be the toughest for 2012?

NFC South has to be in the argument. Panthers are (back) in the hunt, Saints may take a step back depending on Brees holdout/Bounty gate, Falcons are still a force with Ryan. Buccaneers took a step back last year but they had 10 wins prior. TOUGH division.

NFC North is still monster. Packers, Lions, Vikings, Bears. ick. Cutler is back, Haney out makes Bears back in. Lions have done a 180 and are in it. AP is back with Vikings - if they get Ponder going ouch...and of course the Packers are awesome.

AFC North - first time any division had 3 playoff teams in it. Bengals, Ravens, Steelers, Browns. Browns our their weak link but the other three? Very tough.

So which division do you think will be dominant?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the NFC North was the toughest last year.

NFC South wasn't even close. Yeah we threatened people but after the first few weeks the Bucks were total garbage. While not the worst division, I think we were pretty bad.

AFC North has an argument but IMO the top 3 NFC North teams are better than the top 3 AFC North teams, and I think the Vikings and Browns are both better than their records and likely about equal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I gotta say AFC and NFC North, two week links would be the browns and Vikes, next year AP might not even be healthy enough to be productive, and the browns need a few pieces on offense to compete in that division.

2012 ranking IMO are,

1 NFC North

2 AFC North

3 NFC East

4 NFC South

5 AFC East

6 AFC South

7 NFC West

8 AFC West

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it is too early to tell as far as 2012 division rankings, because the draft & free agency (especially Manning) really could drastically change things... Take our division, for instance... if Brees leaves the Saints and/or they get totally raped by the NFL, we'll be a weaker division... but if they get a slap on the wrist and Brees stays, they replace/keep people and are strong, then the NFC South will be one of the better divisions again next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AFC West is either the toughest or weakest, within the divisions.

8-8 wins the division! 9-7 for sure! And the teams seems to split when it comes to paying each other. On paper they appear to be the toughest.

Outside the division, I would say, NFC East. Giants, Cowboys and Iggles can either be tough or cream puffs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With the influx of talented QBs lately. Seems like almost everybody has a QB now.

Which makes any division a potential monster.

With all these QBs floating around. Defense is going to try and make a comeback. Balance is the name of the game. No more all O and crappy D, or all D and some O. If you don't have an O, you cannot compete. If you do have an O, you better bring a D with you. If you want to be the man, you had better be able to stop the man.

Man this is a great time to be an NFL fan. And GOOOOO CATS!!!!!!!!!!!!1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't care about offensive production for a team that literally only threw to him and the running back. I care about what I see on film:   Dude cannot separate on his own against talented LBs/S and had to be schemed open; his route running is below average; while pretty athletic, he doesn't have elite athleticism or speed; his blocking form has quite a few red flags (dude should be a dominant run blocker for his size). He was talented enough to get open in college against a slower LB/S; that won't be the case in the NFL. Not to mention, the dude pretty much was nonexistent until this year for Penn St. If I am drafting a TE in the top 10, choosing a 5th year senior that didn't do anything until his last season should be pretty alarming. Not saying he is going to be a bad player - I think he will be a solid short/intermediate possession TE in the NFL. I just don't understand the logic of taking him top 10
    • No one is arguing where we were on the season.  After the benching Bryce was one of the top deep ball passers in the league.  It's a skillset he has just shown he is capable of doing.  I believe he led the league in week 12 and was one of the top ones for that final quarter.  Dance around the topic and argue the stats all you want, I'm just going by what I saw on TV and read about.   https://x.com/PattonAnalytics/status/1877044086709854343 https://www.si.com/nfl/panthers/news/bryce-young-best-against-pressure-throwing-deep Hey it surprised me as well, but I'm not going to hide my head in the sand and try to ignore what is clearly right in front of me.  People have a hard time admitting their original thought may have been wrong.  That's just the world we live in.  We will see if Young can keep it up next year or not, but signs are point to DC running his offense regardless of who is QB.  
    • You are right, but as of late there has been more rookie TEs making immediate impact on teams. McBride, Laporta, Kincaid and obv Bowers.  My true opinion is the team has so many holes they can go multiple directions including Safety. So it just comes down to out of all the talent in the draft who will make the immediate impact. Wr? TE? LB? 
×
×
  • Create New...