Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Saints in BIG trouble...


CatMan72

Recommended Posts

Interesting conclusion drawn over on Pro Football Talk...

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/03/bensons-loyalty-to-loomis-seems-odd/

As it relates to Saints G.M. Mickey Loomis, the most troubling aspect of the league’s announcement regarding the team’s bounty system comes in two sentences: “Mr. Benson advised league staff that he had directed his general manager, Mickey Loomis, to ensure that any bounty program be discontinued immediately. The evidence showed that Mr. Loomis did not carry out Mr. Benson’s directions.”

In any other business, operating in any other industry, Benson’s next step would have been to fire Loomis, with cause. No severance pay, no notice. Benson gave Loomis a direct order to ensure that the team wasn’t engaged in a Cobra Kai-style program that blatantly violated the rules, if not the law.

And Loomis defied Benson.

But Benson didn’t fire Loomis. Jay Glazer of FOX reports that neither Loomis nor coach Sean Payton will be fired by Benson.

It’s possibly not the first time Loomis lied to Benson. Former Saints director of security Geoffrey Santini alleged in connection with his wrongful termination lawsuit against the team that Loomis lied to Benson regarding Payton’s involvement in unauthorized Vicodin use. In that case, Loomis supposedly was protecting Payton.

In this case, it’s hard not to wonder whether Loomis is protecting Benson.

The league’s announcement emphasizes that Benson didn’t know about the bounty program. But what if Benson actually knew? Would he admit it, or would the Saints concoct a plan to insulate Benson, in the same way that Loomis allegedly tried to insulate Payton regarding the Vicodin fiasco?

Under this theory (and it’s only a theory), Loomis would take the fall and Benson’s hands would remain clean.

Of course, it wouldn’t be right to fire Loomis under those circumstances. It also would be risky. If Loomis were fired after taking responsibility for something he actually didn’t do, Loomis easily could spill the beans.

I need to be clear on this. There’s no evidence that Benson knew about the bounty program, or that Loomis and Benson came up with an explanation that protected Benson while throwing Loomis onto the fleur-de-lis.

Other than, of course, the bizarre reality that Benson won’t fire Loomis, even though Loomis blatantly defied Benson on such a critical matter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The rest of the league is going to realize that every team does this and the Saints will get a slap on the wrist. Just glad it is not turning into the big deal that others earlier predicted

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/04/sports/football/former-jets-player-calls-bounties-inmates-governing-themselves.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1

It will be more than a slap.

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2012/writers/don_banks/03/02/mickey.loomis/index.html?xid=cnnbin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting conclusion drawn over on Pro Football Talk...

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/03/03/bensons-loyalty-to-loomis-seems-odd/

When I first heard the bit about Loomis lying to Benson, I figured Loomis was toast.

Natural conclusion, right?

Only in reports since, not only has Loomis not been fired. Benson has shown no inclination to fire him, or discipline him in any way.

Does make ya think, doesn't it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I first heard the bit about Loomis lying to Benson, I figured Loomis was toast.

Natural conclusion, right?

Only in reports since, not only has Loomis not been fired. Benson has shown no inclination to fire him, or discipline him in any way.

Does make ya think, doesn't it?

The owner was adding to the pot also, that Bounty program was there before Williams got there, proof.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The rest of the league is going to realize that every team does this and the Saints will get a slap on the wrist. Just glad it is not turning into the big deal that others earlier predicted

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/04/sports/football/former-jets-player-calls-bounties-inmates-governing-themselves.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1

You are such a pathetic fugging joke LOL.

I don't know why you're sweating it. Just jump on the Giants bandwagon like you jumped on the Taints bandwagon 2 years ago. I'm sure you can get a refund on all those Saint anal beads you ordered after the super bowl (which is now a tainted victory with an asterisk).

Suck it saint boy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Payton will soon be a mere spectator. This will be a blow that will set NO back years. They will finish on the bottom NFC South for at least 4 years. Just that kind of demoralizing thing. The ligit NO players will want to leave to escape the stigma.

I just amazes me that there are still fans that can't see the difference in being paid to play football and being paid to target specific players for injuries. Perhaps if it were their favorite players. Certianly if it were their knees and ankles, they would understand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...