KKL 2.0 after Combine Mock. with trade.

[rayzor]

like was said, we aren't getting enough out of this deal. either their 1,2,3 for our 1 and 4 or add an early pick from next year to what we're getting.

that said, i'm not a fan of any TEs in this class. i'd rather just go with who we have and use that pick on devon wylie.

aside from that i'd love it.

[JawnyBlaze]

My question is, what is up witht he "knoe"? I know the w is next to the e, but it's EVERY single time lol

[stirs]

Love the top half of the draft.

If I am not mistaken, the kid from Cal lit up the 40 at the combine.

[MadHatter]

Still say that we DO NOT take a DT in the first round. It very well may be a smoke screen, but the FO and Rivera have said numerous times that DT is not that high on their list of needs. We have quite a few young DT's on this rister that Riversa seems to be pretty high on. If anything, I think we add another vet (such as Garay) and let the young guys develop.

I think a ton of people are going to be surprised and go off the deep end when we don't take one.

I think we are going DE, OT, or LB (could be Kuechly) in the first....unless Blackmon or Claiborne fall to us (which I highly doubt).

[DaCityKats]

not bad KKL. Kendricks can play OLB since he played there his Junior year at Cal in a 3-4. would be a nice WLB wit his speed.

[Shotgun]

I like your draft just dont see why anyone would want to trade up to the 9th spot. Like last year there isnt a clear pick at our spot. We will have to gamble, and hopefully get lucky like last year.

[davos]

Still say that we DO NOT take a DT in the first round. It very well may be a smoke screen, but the FO and Rivera have said numerous times that DT is not that high on their list of needs. We have quite a few young DT's on this rister that Riversa seems to be pretty high on. If anything, I think we add another vet (such as Garay) and let the young guys develop.

I think a ton of people are going to be surprised and go off the deep end when we don't take one.

I think we are going DE, OT, or LB (could be Kuechly) in the first....unless Blackmon or Claiborne fall to us (which I highly doubt).

I'm feeling what your saying. If Garay is pretty much a Panther, we got him and Edwards with a bunch of promising guys already here to work with in Kearse, McClain, and Shirley.

I think the DE position in particular is one where we should be looking at more. We may take one early.

[MadHatter]

I'm feeling what your saying. If Garay is pretty much a Panther, we got him and Edwards with a bunch of promising guys already here to work with in Kearse, McClain, and Shirley.

I think the DE position in particular is one where we should be looking at more. We may take one early.

I absolutely would prefer DE than DT in the first.

CJ is legit....Hardy is decent. the other guys we have (Applewhite, etc) are situational at best.

We are not solid at DE.

[JawnyBlaze]

We are less solid at DT than DE. Neblett is decent, Edwards might be decent (he hasn't played for us yet), everyone else is situational. At least we have 1 very good DE.