Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Opposing Line Coach Says Poe 'Took Plays Off'


Ruff

Recommended Posts

It's a concern, but as others have said all defensive lineman take plays off and when your as talented as this guy on a team like Memphis you may need to take more plays off to compensate for the fact that you have no talent around you and are constantly being double-teamed, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Non-issue for Coples too. He is nearly 300 pounds.

less forgiving that that weight. he's 280 something, right?

anything past 300 pounds is putting a lot more pressure on hearts and knees than anything below that. the body's not really meant to carry that much weight, regardless if it's muscle or fat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

less forgiving that that weight. he's 280 something, right?

anything past 300 pounds is putting a lot more pressure on hearts and knees than anything below that. the body's not really meant to carry that much weight, regardless if it's muscle or fat.

So it doesn't bother you that the coach didn't say "he took some plays off" but instead said he "took more plays off than most"

“Yeah,” the coach conceded. “But he took off more than most. He did get better last year than he was the year before. He just was never that productive, but I heard they didn’t require him to do that much. He was definitely someone I took into account with schemes. … I’m not at all surprised to hear that he’s blowing up at the Combine, at all.”

So he gets a pass of taking more plays off than other DTs because.... why?

PS- I am just being a dick ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the same C R A P that was said of PEPPER's before the draft!

I don't care if a player takes plays off, as long as he shows up like Pepper's did when needed

So basically, you are drafting DT version of Peppers -minus the proven freak football play/production in college?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I complete disagree. Who is available is extremely relevant. If you have a couple of players you would be happy with and you can still get them if you trade back, you should do that in a heartbeat. Being afraid that people will lowball you next year is an odd stance. Then you just say no next year, problem solved. In this particular draft you can get a very good player at 46. But to each their own.
    • I don't think so.  Watson really screwed them up.  I see something happening, but do not know what.  Cousins could be had in a trade--but they liked Flacco when he played there.  If it were me, I would not spend the #2 pick on Sanders.  I would go after a tier 2 qb because I think Will Howard is going to start in the NFL soon, and I think Ewers was rated very high at the beginning of the year--he knows adversity and he beat out a Manning while taking Texas to 2 playoff appearances.  I am not good at picking QBs, but I think Howard's run pass option and his accuracy is going to help someone.  Stay in Ohio and play for the Browns behind Flacco--
    • After Cam at #1, there are three or four elite players and there could be a trade--If I am the Giants and I am needed a winning season badly and I have several needs, I might trade out and pick up mid first and an extra second rounder, including a QB--while nobody is going to move up to #3 for Sanders, they might for Carter or Hunter.  If the Giants then move back, Sanders could still be in play.  That could be the trade in the top 3.  New England wants Campbell and I get that; Jacksonville at #5 could move back if someone wants Graham or Jeanty.  But barring some trade, the top 4 are probably locked in. So it could be 2 hours into the draft before we get any surprises. Nice list, by the way--you nailed it.
×
×
  • Create New...