Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Kendall Reyes

jarhead

By jarhead,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Actionman0z Veteran

Actionman0z

Posted
Posted

Also note 10-12 DB's did more reps at 225 than Brockers.... and that is really sad. Its funny that people still say he will have the ability to be violent at the point of attack at the next level with that weak bench. Its not super telling, but he will be exposed. And someone else said he was fat, he looked sloppy in the Under Armour.. looked big and imposing, but he was fat. The only person I thought looked worse with the eye test than him, was Riley Rieff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
Posted

Also note 10-12 DB's did more reps at 225 than Brockers.... and that is really sad. Its funny that people still say he will have the ability to be violent at the point of attack at the next level with that weak bench. Its not super telling, but he will be exposed. And someone else said he was fat, he looked sloppy in the Under Armour.. looked big and imposing, but he was fat. The only person I thought looked worse with the eye test than him, was Riley Rieff.

Reiff looked like our pizza delivery boy, but some OL look like that and are studs.

Brockers has a huge wingspan, but he is really no more ready to play NFL DT than Tannehill is to play QB. Maybe down the road.

I am really thinking, with the Giants super bowl and all, DEs will go fast. We could be taking one of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
koolkatluke Newbie

koolkatluke

Posted
Posted

Also note 10-12 DB's did more reps at 225 than Brockers.... and that is really sad. Its funny that people still say he will have the ability to be violent at the point of attack at the next level with that weak bench. Its not super telling, but he will be exposed. And someone else said he was fat, he looked sloppy in the Under Armour.. looked big and imposing, but he was fat. The only person I thought looked worse with the eye test than him, was Riley Rieff.

Didn't Warren Sapp, and Richard Seymor have low rep numbers on the bench? I might be wrong thoe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
carolina-chuck Newbie

carolina-chuck

Posted
Posted

Also note 10-12 DB's did more reps at 225 than Brockers.... and that is really sad. Its funny that people still say he will have the ability to be violent at the point of attack at the next level with that weak bench. Its not super telling, but he will be exposed. And someone else said he was fat, he looked sloppy in the Under Armour.. looked big and imposing, but he was fat. The only person I thought looked worse with the eye test than him, was Riley Rieff.

why are you such a Brockers hater?

i knoe people who dont even play football 21 years old benching 225 30+ reps.

once brockers hit the NFL, team will make sure he gets his strength straighten out. its not all about being able to rep 30+ to be able to get to the qb. its about technique and skills , getting off blocks. having strengths is a qudo but not major.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
klumme Enthusiast

klumme

Posted
Posted

The people who doubt Brockers strenght really should put on his tape. That dude is a beast. He got 35" arms while a guy like Poe got 32" you dont have to be a world champ in bench to realize how big a different that makes.

The problem for us is he does not look very athletic and thus you have to ask yourself if he can be a great passrusher.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...