Trading up...

[Montsta]

If anything I could see Hurney trading back into the first in the 25+ range and giving up our 2nd plus a 2nd next year. Maybe with NE because they have two picks in that range and we've dealt with them in the past. According to draft value charts I think that their mid-twenties pick would be close to 800 value, so we could do our 2nd plus a 2nd next year, and maybe get a 5th from them in return. If there is a Jenkins-type value left at that time, I could see Hurney doing that move in a heartbeat.

But I personally feel like there will be too many studs still available at #9 (Brockers, Coples, etc.) to warrant moving with our first pick.

[Ken]

Given that we don't have a 3rd round pick, either picking at 9th or trading down(to get more picks) are much, much more sensible. Too many needs to trade up.

[Ivan The Awesome]

As much as I love claiborne, I'm going to say, hell to the no...

[Kurb]

It would be horrible for the development of this team to trade UP in the draft. A trade BACK however makes WAY too much sense right now.

If we get the right sucker we could easily end up with Something like Cox and Jennoris Jenkins (just talking about typle of player) with our first 2 picks.

Tannhill, Trent Richardson, and their ilk need to slip to 9 for us to make those kinda moves. Bengals/Jets are my trade up targets. Teams that think they are close and have a defined need that will be there.

Im really praying for a trade back tbh. I am a big Brockers fan, but the ability to add 2 90 grade guys in sacrifice of a 100 grade guy is too good to pass up.

[KaseKlosed]