Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Deunta Williams Worth looking into?


micnificent28

Recommended Posts

He was compensated with a free ride to college which was something on the order of 100,000 dollars with all things considered. Kids play college ball because it is a free ride with a chance to get an education. No one is promised an NFl career and he is a prime example of what can happen. The injury happened whether he was suspended or not. 95% of all student athletes across all sports don't have a pro career. It is the normnot the exception. The few who make it seem to skew people's expectations as if most people who play football make it to the pros. He should be glad he got the education and can practice a trade for free. Anything over and above that is gravy.

I agree with you p55, but what I'm saying is, MOST athletes think they are in that 5% that will make it and don't plan beyond that. And again, a large portion of the players on successful programs come from backgrounds in which higher education is of little to no value. Everyone's goal is to make it, and most of them don't think beyond that.

From everything I know about Deunta from people that know him on campus is that he always valued his education, so in my opinion, he is the exception to the norm... And we're seeing that come to fruition now. He didn't have all his eggs in the football basket.

What you stated is true, most don't make it, but in direct contradiction to that, most of them think they will and few realize they won't. When you're bringing in players who don't care about an education but are making money for the university, they should get a little piece of the pie.

So, the only thing you said that I disagree with is why kids play college ball... Most don't play it to get an education, they play it to get shine and "make it," even though most don't. So giving them a free education majoring in something like "History of Butt Flute" isn't doing anyone any good except the university.

And to be honest, it shouldn't cost as much to attend universities as they have us believe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with you p55, but what I'm saying is, MOST athletes think they are in that 5% that will make it and don't plan beyond that. And again, a large portion of the players on successful programs come from backgrounds in which higher education is of little to no value. Everyone's goal is to make it, and most of them don't think beyond that.

From everything I know about Deunta from people that know him on campus is that he always valued his education, so in my opinion, he is the exception to the norm... And we're seeing that come to fruition now. He didn't have all his eggs in the football basket.

What you stated is true, most don't make it, but in direct contradiction to that, most of them think they will and few realize they won't. When you're bringing in players who don't care about an education but are making money for the university, they should get a little piece of the pie.

So, the only thing you said that I disagree with is why kids play college ball... Most don't play it to get an education, they play it to get shine and "make it," even though most don't. So giving them a free education majoring in something like "History of Butt Flute" isn't doing anyone any good except the university.

And to be honest, it shouldn't cost as much to attend universities as they have us believe.

I think much of that is true particularly for minority students. Coaches sell the big dream to these high school kids to sign them and then when they get injured sometimes don't even honor the scholarship. The graduation rate for athletes in general is 80% but there is still a racial difference with white males athletes graduating at 87% while black males are behind at 68%. Women rates are much higher for blacks and whites generally over 90% because they know they are not going pro for the most part.

http://espn.go.com/college-sports/story/_/id/7148351/ncaa-reports-improvements-athlete-graduation-success-rates

Basketball and football trail most other sports and this is where the most abuses occur. Basketball drafts only 57-60 players which also counts international players and many of these guys don't make it. Yet look at how many college basketball teams there are. It is ridiculous.

I think a lot more education needs to be done to help teenagers understand that the only thing that can't be taken away is what is between their ears.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hardly ever here a State fan come on here and clamor about signing their players once in the NFL. I would say they're typically the more reserved fanbase compared to the vast amount of UNC fans who are blindly in love with any player from their school. Not that it's as bad on here as it is off the forum boards.

Obviously Dukies are non-existent and App. State fans don't voice their opinions that often simply because they are a FCS school. Brian Quick and Armanti are two of the only NFL players I can remember from the recent past.

Was Duenta Williams good in college? Do we need a safety? I would imagine the OP answered yes to both, asked about him and found out his broken leg ended his career. If there wasn't always an inferior stater riding the nuts of every Tarheel related thread, it wouldn't go on this long to begin with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Bryce hasn't done a single thing to prove he deserves to have his option picked up.  I'd have less of an issue with us declining the option and bringing him back as the starter next year than I would have us picking up that option, as that means he's on our cap books for the next 2 years instead of 1, even if he's cut before year 5. Tua threw for 3,500 yards with a 25-8 TD-INT ratio in just 13 starts the year before they picked up his option, and then threw for over 4,600 yards before they gave him his extension. Kyler threw for 3,722, 3,971, and 3,787 in 16, 16, and 14 games (while rushing for 544, 819, and 423 in those seasons) before they picked up his option and then signed him to an extension before year 4. Jones threw for 3,200 yards with a 3-1 TD-INT ratio with another 700 yards and 7 TDs rushing in year 4 before they signed him to his extension. Bryce has thrown for 2,877 and 2,400 yards in 16 and 12 starts his two seasons, while being on pace for 3,128 yards in a 17 game season so far this year. The closest comparison to any of them was Jones, who while he's turned it around this year, is someone I think everyone can agree was not a player who deserved that extension after that season. If people think those other QB's having their options picked up and/or given extensions were a mistake, in what world can you look at what Bryce has done and make any rational argument for him even being brought back as our starter next year, let alone also picking up his option that would cost us about $27 million fully guaranteed.
    • I don't think we would actually play Hooker but hopefully we also just don't see. I don't view Dalton/Bryce as a worse option than Winston/Howell. I just think we disagree on this specific subject is all.
    • I guarantee tepper would fire him if we lost out and he’d be justified 
×
×
  • Create New...