Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Question on last drive


SamTheRam

Recommended Posts

I thought it was stupid too. Why didn't NYG just put 15 men on the field for the entire last series then? It would have ate those last few seconds away..

I was wondering the same thing...it'd make sense to do that in such situations if you ate up the clock and only lost 5 yards for each flag....wonder if they'd call an unsportsmanlike penalty for doing that when it's so obvious?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was wondering the same thing...it'd make sense to do that in such situations if you ate up the clock and only lost 5 yards for each flag....wonder if they'd call an unsportsmanlike penalty for doing that when it's so obvious?

They would definately lose draft picks for doing it in the super bowl. And the competition commitee would change the rules in the offseason like they probably will for the two things the giants did this season. (fake injuries vs rams and the penalty were talking about now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Penalties that are called before the ball is snapped like illegal procedure result in an automatic penalty and the clock is reset to what it was it was before the play started if the refs don't come in and get it stopped before the ball is snapped. Teams can't refuse or accept the penalty. Penalties that occur after the ball is snapped (which this was because if someone had gotten off the field before the ball was snapped it wouldn't have been a penalty) allows the other team to accept or decline the penalty based on the outcome of the play. The time it takes to run the play does come off the clock regardless of whether the team takes the play or the penalty. So it was going to be 9 seconds regardless of whether NE took or refused the penalty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was wondering the same thing...it'd make sense to do that in such situations if you ate up the clock and only lost 5 yards for each flag....wonder if they'd call an unsportsmanlike penalty for doing that when it's so obvious?

If Brady saw that you would just spike the ball which takes little to no time off the clock and get a 5 yard penalty. Since the clock doesn't start until the ball is snapped if they had too many people on the next play you would do the same thing again. You could move 50 yards in about 15 seconds. Then on the last play if they did that you would keep getting more plays since the game can't end on a defensive penalty.

No one would be stupid enough to do that over and over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All right, thanks. Wasn't aware that if someone on defense jumped offsides and you took the penalty, that time ran off the clock. Thought it was a dead ball penalty.

It can be a dead ball foul if the refs stop the play because the defensive player is unabated to the quarterback and it occurs well before the snap of the ball. If the defensive player moves across the line which induces the offensive player to false start then it is automatically assessed and time is reset since the play never occurred. If the defensive player moves offsides right before the ball is snapped then play isn't stopped and the offense can accept or refuse the penalty based on the result of the play and time does elapse off the clock.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We’re in dire need of some speed  Luther Burden or Isiah Bond please 
    • Based on the NHL cap today ($88M), the Canes have $22.9M in projected space going into the 25-26 season. Seems to be a consensus the cap will increase to $92.5M next season, but let's not assume. The core of this team is locked up for a couple more years, with the only UFAs at the end of this season: Roslovic, Fast, Robinson, Jost, with Orlov and Burns on D. Remember Seth Jarvis's contract? Remember the press it got because the Canes found a loophole that allowed them to get his contract under the cap by using "deferred salary?" Yeah, don't expect that won't be addressed by the league and that loophole closed. That being said, if the Canes decide to sign Necas long term, they should do it next season and they'll probably need to pay him Aho level money- close to $10M a year. Let's assume the team gets through the season without any career or long term injury concerns. And, let's be honest in the conversation. Does Jesper Fast have a place on this team right now or have we found the right combination on the ice that he may not be needed?  Does Brent Burns retire, or will he decide to stay another year? If so, there's a 1-year thank you for your service $6M deal.  If Roslovic shows out this year, that's gonna be a pretty big contract compared to the 1-year, $2.8M he's getting now. He may command around $4.5 - 5M to stay. So, those 2 guys are gonna cost you $11M. Get Necas a new deal at $10M, you're up to $14.5M of the $22.9M in space. So you've got about $8.4M to work in Orlov and Robinson, which is do-able. Plenty of room to work deals and keep every one of the UFAs if the Canes so desire.  
    • Dan is doing a fine job, however, I'm not sold on Canales. I think he needs to give up play-calling duties, but I also realize that this wasn't an easy fix.
×
×
  • Create New...