Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

trading down with patriots


buck11

Recommended Posts

They'd probably have to throw in a 2nd or 3rd. Not sure I'd want to trade down that far though...we could get two new starters probably (a new DT in maybe Still or Brockers but more likely Poe or Thompson and a new CB in Minnifield or one of the other 2nd tier guys) but less likely to get a real impact player. If we got their #27 and #31/32 and their #63/64, then traded back up to the mid to late teens using the #27 and our #41/42 (assuming we get their 2nd also) to ensure getting Brockers or Still or some other impact player I'd be more ok with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Although, a second look at the value chart (yea I know it's just a rough guide, not a rule) says the #27 + their #63/64 would be enough to get back up into the mid to late teens by itself. Leaving us with that first pick (probably somewhere between #16-20), #31/32, and #41/42.

In that scenario I'd like:

#16-20 (whichever we could trade back up to using their #27 and 63/64): Brockers or Still

#31/32: Zach Brown could fall this far. If he doesn't, Minnifield or even Kirkpatrick could fall that far due to the weed and injury concerns.

#41/42: If we get Brown: Minnifield, Gilmore, Dennard or even Jenkins could be available here. If not, Markelle Martin should be available. If we don't get Brown and take a CB at #31/32 Martin would probably be my first choice, followed by an OT or OLB.

A trio of those players would be a dream draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

True, NE generally trades back.

I guarantee they move back into the second round with one of their two first rounders with someone wanting to trade back into the bottom of the first round.

You are also correct that they would bend Hurney over pretty bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone that NE would trade up for would be worth taking. They need corners, pass rushers, and OL. We need...corners, pass rushers, and OL. Not to mention I don't want Hurney in talks with the Pats. He would get obliterated in a negotiation.

Not that there's any pass rushers they'd move up to our spot to take, but the kind of pass rushers they need are different than the kind we need (for the most part). They are about a 50/50 split between defensive schemes, but I think they still use a 3-4 OLB more than a 4-3 DE. And if NE would trade up for us, it'd be more worth our while to get more picks than to take that one guy. They don't need quite as many holes filled as we do, so it may be worth it to them to use a few picks on 1 guy whereas it'd be more beneficial to us to get more picks.

With that said, stirs is right. They usually trade down, not up. This scenario is extremely unlikely, but it's fun to speculate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

pats will most likely trade one of their first rounders, but they won't be trading up. that's not their MO.

there's a couple teams i could see doing it in the first like the redskins or dolphins for RG3, the bears for blackmon (i've heard that they desperately want a blue chip WR and are willing to trade to get him), the bengals for richardson, the cowboys for kirkpatrick (which they probably won't need to do because he's dumb and hurt his draft stock).

those are just off the top of my head. the bengals are likely the only one who would trade with us, imo. maybe the texans b/c i ehar they are wanting another legit WR across from AJ, but after blackmon there's about 4 or 5 in which there isn't a lot of seperation or difference in quality so they probably wouldn't have to trade up to find the guy they need.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...