Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Don't assume the Panthers first pick...

Mr. Scot

By Mr. Scot,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted

...gets used on a defensive player.

That is, if you believe what Marty Hurney tells Joe Person.

And contrary to popular belief, the Panthers will not be limiting their focus to the defensive fields while evaluating possible prospects for their first-round pick.

The Panthers, who will pick 8th or 9th based on the outcome of a coin flip with Miami, have needs on both sides of the ball, according to general manager Marty Hurney.

"I don't think you lock yourself in to offense or defense as far as that first pick goes, and really any pick," Hurney said this week. "You have to go by your board. And we've done that and I think we've done well by doing that."

Inside the Panthers

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Lumps Newbie

Lumps

Posted
Posted

Yea but think about it. Only defensive players are really at our BPA other than Oline. WR and Oline are all I think we'd invest this much in.

BUT, if Hurney truley believes Otah is the player he wants than I see no reason to pick Oline depth with the first pick.

That leaves us with WR and Blackmon is the only offensive player/position worth a top 10 for us and he will not be there. Not only that but he had a DUI a year ago, highly doubt we trade up for him.

There are an abundant of defensive players (and olineman) right where we pick. If we picked a DT we could possibly get the best the draft has to offer where as we'd likley have the third OT leftovers.

If Hurney didn't pick the BPA I would say he is leaning towards offense. I guess you could believe an offensive player will be BPA but I honestly don't think it will be only BPA, we don't need a lot of offensive positions.

If the BPA are offensive players I would rather trade down because only 1 WR is worth it and if we are betting on Otah a top 10 pick on oline isn't needed.

Of course if Hurney is just fuging around though and has no faith in Otah, it would seem we'd certainly would need and choose an OT.

My opinion is I just don't see it, I think we are going defense all the way. We have an offense that can already win and compete.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Khaki Lackey Mentor

Khaki Lackey

Posted
Posted

A week ago, I was thinking doubling down on offense wouldn't be a disaster. Our D should improve next year, with the recovery from injuries and experience for the rookies etc. Plus we'd be hanging 40+ points on just about everybody. Then I saw what happened to Green Bay and the Saints.

I know the pats have a lackluster D, but they looked like the '76 Steelers against the Broncos.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DawgzLife Newbie

DawgzLife

Posted
Posted

I don't think anyone should ever paint themselves into a corner on how they will make the selection. BPA is the standard line. I do think it will end up being a D player vs. O player, but if it is a guy who will help the team immediately & significantly, I'm fine either way.

Let talk BPA for a minute: Does anyone else think that it's funny how much the GMs & the talking heads focus on BPA? Look at the draft sites & 'experts' then look at how the draft shakes out. Sometimes a guy 'rated' 1st round by the experts falls way down & you see why in their career. Many times certain teams rank a guy much higher than another team.

My whole point is that BPA is an educated guess to how a guy fits in. If you have a player sitting there for a position of need ranked on your board as #9 BPA & a position you don't need as #8, I would say it is ridiculous to go BPA. THe BPA thing is a way to mkae GMs feel like they did the best thing, but it's really a craps shoot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TylerVagyler Newbie

TylerVagyler

Posted
Posted

The only offensive player that I'd want in the top 10 in Blackmon, and he'll be gone. Kendall Wright is another great WR in the draft and apparently a lot of teams have him in front of Blackmon on their boards. I'm assuming Riley Reiff and Jonathan Martin are two OT that we'd be interested in taking. Dre Kirkpatrick and Courtney Upshaw, both from Alabama, are two defensive players I'd be happy with taking.

If Claiborne isn't on the board, it's really a toss up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • MHS831
      High look overview...

      By MHS831 · Posted

      Personally, I am not sold on Bryce yet--and I do not think anyone is saying they are, but I don't think Ward is on table when we draft anyway.  Not even sure if I would rather have him than one of the later QBs.  I see a lot of potential in Allar, Nussmeire, Rourke, and even Hamilton from Ohio State--Milroe is intriguing, but I am not sure he is an NFL QB.  Ewers is that sleeper who falls and becomes a solid starter. I think that we sign a veteran who has played and we draft one of these project QBs. To your point:  With that in mind, I think you have to take QB off the table in round 1, and if Bryce can string 4-5 games like KC together, we still need to draft a QB in round three or so---I really think Rourke is a great fit for this offense--he is accurate and gets the ball out quickly---he impressed me vs OSU.   Reason?  I think we may have a tough decision to make about Bryce in 2 years--will he be worth $60m?  That decision is a lot easier if you have been grooming a backup for 2 years who can play. In round 1: I am hoping for PSU's edge Abdul Carter In round 2:  I would like to see us grab a DT who can rush the passer.  Walter Nolen of Ole Miss is versatile and a bit raw. I think he could be an excellent complement to Brown. In round 3:  I would love ILB Danny Stutsman from Oklahoma.  He is a beast. With 11 picks, I would package our 4th rounders to move up into the third round and take a QB.  At the moment, I think Rourke is trending upward and he has the skills Canales seems to want in a QB.  Quick processor, quick release. I would use the fifth rounders on OL.  I know that I left out WR--however, we are getting Thielen back, XL will be improved, Coker will be improved, and Moore has been surprisingly good.  Sanders (TE) has been more than expected in the passing game.  I think we need D more than WR, and maybe we can get a veteran WR to sign or find a hidden gem late.  
    • Jackie Lee
      Dream big: Imagine this future and tell me how you feel

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      Wouldn't be surprised if he starts a couple Jets games this year with the way the Rodgers thing is going. Giants fans are pissed they didn't keep him lol. He might actually have a little bit of a market. 
    • parker
      Dream big: Imagine this future and tell me how you feel

      By parker · Posted

      I think we look at both.  I wouldn't mind resigning Dalton for a deal.  He would know the offense and there is no pressure to see what we have in him. Then I wouldn't mind finding a low round rookie with potential.
×
×
  • Create New...