Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rivera was on wfnz this am. any recap?


Kurb

Recommended Posts

http://charlotte.cbslocal.com/2012/01/19/panthers-head-coach-ron-rivera-on-the-mac-attack/

Mac Attack 1/19/12:* Panthers Head Coach Ron Rivera joined the guys today to discuss the season, Cam Newton, and what the off season plans could be.

Ron says he really had no idea if they will lose offensive coordinator Rob Chudzinski. It all depends on the interview process and he does with that.* He says he will hate to lose him because they are building something special here and wants “Chud” around to experience all of it.

Mac asked Ron what the biggest area of need is in the off season.** He says you always want to add to the 0-line to avoid holes due to injury.* They are still in the process of finding out what the biggest need is right now.* They will know more when the SR Bowl is over as to what direction they may go in.

Ron does say that defense needs to be addressed and huge problem last year was injuries and the fact the coaching staff was still getting to know all the guys on the roster.* They lost a lot of time due to the lockout.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have to admit I didn't like him leaning on injury so much in this interview, especially the part about Marty Hurney talking to him about how many snaps our starters missed. Yes, we had plenty of injuries, but our roster was not where it needed to be even if not a single player got injured. It just didn't leave me with confidence that they will be aggressive filling holes.

Anyone else find it odd that Rivera is not at the Shrine Game practices with Marty? Don't coaching staffs typically go as well as GM's?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only problem with DLo as a scat back is his ineptness at catching the ball at full speed a la sproles. A scat back is no need at all IMO, especially when we don't have enough carries as it is for our three headed monster. I think RR was just indirectly praising sproles with that comment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have to admit I didn't like him leaning on injury so much in this interview, especially the part about Marty Hurney talking to him about how many snaps our starters missed. Yes, we had plenty of injuries, but our roster was not where it needed to be even if not a single player got injured. It just didn't leave me with confidence that they will be aggressive filling holes.

Anyone else find it odd that Rivera is not at the Shrine Game practices with Marty? Don't coaching staffs typically go as well as GM's?

On one hand I agree with you but on the other, injuries played a huge part. I think we had capable backups (Conner, Gaither, Fua, etc) and then when starters got hurt these guys were put into a spot that they couldn't survive in. Connor did well then he went down bringing in 3rd string guys. Not good, and I don't expect any teams 3rd stringers to be starting material. With all that being said a full off-season and time in the weight room will help the young guys and the coaching staff will have a full year of getting players adjusted to the scheme.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On one hand I agree with you but on the other, injuries played a huge part. I think we had capable backups (Conner, Gaither, Fua, etc) and then when starters got hurt these guys were put into a spot that they couldn't survive in. Connor did well then he went down bringing in 3rd string guys. Not good, and I don't expect any teams 3rd stringers to be starting material. With all that being said a full off-season and time in the weight room will help the young guys and the coaching staff will have a full year of getting players adjusted to the scheme.

Don't get me wrong; there is no doubt that injuries played a huge part in our season. I just don't want the GM and HC focused on that. Injuries occur every year so the focus has to go beyond the penciled in starters. Get the 53 best players possible and we will overcome injuries.

I guess I'm afraid they have a false sense of security. Marty saying "hey Ron, did you know we missed more snaps to injury last year than any other team" leads me to believe that Marty will be less aggressive filling holes than is prudent.

But it is easy to read too much into an offhand comment. It just struck me wrong and probably means nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean it's not even like this was his worst game of the season... I'm not done with him by any means but this feels more the norm for him than the exception:/
    • I'd give it a C mainly because of Brooks.  If we just didn't have a 2nd I'd argue B to B+ tbh. Brooks was a bad gamble, tho one that could still pay off long term. Yes XL only has 400 yards but... Look who is throwing him the ball. And I think he isn't a "true #1" but he's been able to consistently get open. Hands definitely need to be cleaned up.  But he should end the year with 500-600 yards. Like you said - Sanders looks great.  Get him a better QB / more time with a QB and I think he's gonna impress. We added a couple rotational players on D that have both made plays and show promise for the future from later rounds. So I'd say, Brooks really hurts this drafts grade. It'll be interesting to see how it progresses over the next 3 years. I've overall really liked Morgan's FA acquisitions, so...
    • Oh he would absolutely flourish. It’s the panthers way. It’s no different with coaches. Sometimes they reach their expiration date, go somewhere else, and find new success.  Similarly to Burns, how long to wait for the light to finally turn on?  Market forces will demand a salary that the panthers can not responsibly match. Sliding him to guard will fit his skill set better, but he has played LT for 3 years. He will receive offers from other teams wanting to pay him LT money.  At guard, he won’t start with what they have paid Hunt and Lewis. Center then?? Dunno. Maybe? He will become a backup by default once they draft their stud LT. I doubt Dan just stands pat. That’s not his MO.  So where does this put him? Can you match what other teams will offer for a backup LT/guard? Do you dish out franchise LT $ on a guy who still needs significant improvement in pass protection. This team will be DOA in the playoffs with the very first team who has a formidable speed rusher. What if he has hit his ceiling in pass protection already and they sign him long term? It’s a big gamble either way. 
×
×
  • Create New...