2012 Mock offseason and Draft/Free Agency- Offense/ ST

[Munch4455]

We went over this before, you cant just removr a bid and stick someone else with it. Im glad you matched my bid bc i dont wanna pay that much for garcon, and now ive moved on to laurent robinson. I dont have the cap for both so you are stuck with the bid.

Edit: For anyone reading this wanting clarity. He matched my $10 bid for garcon, then edited his post to say he removed the bid after I bid on laurent robinson.

[Devoid]

We went over this before, you cant just removr a bid and stick someone else with it. Im glad you matched my bid bc i dont wanna pay that much for garcon, and now ive moved on to laurent robinson. I dont have the cap for both so you are stuck with the bid.

Edit: For anyone reading this wanting clarity. He matched my $10 bid for garcon, then edited his post to say he removed the bid after I bid on laurent robinson.

Thought for a rule: If the highest bidder removes the bid, it then falls to the second highest bidder at the time of their bid. If the second highest bidder refuses then the player gets reset to 0 bids. Also as a penalty the two highest bidders are not allowed to bid again on the player.

[Munch4455]

Just went through this with Radiokiller earlier today. We came to the conclusion that if the person with the 2nd bid still wants the player, then the top bid can be cancelled. But if they don't then the leading bid has to stick by their commitment.

[JawnyBlaze]

This is crazy. Should just be no retracting bids, in my opinion. Most auction style systems don't allow retracting bids...it's too complicated and screws people over. Whatever the case is, we need an official ruling by dacitykats in public so there's no confusion.

[Munch4455]

This is crazy. Should just be no retracting bids, in my opinion. Most auction style systems don't allow retracting bids...it's too complicated and screws people over. Whatever the case is, we need an official ruling by dacitykats in public so there's no confusion.

I agree. Radiokiller did the right thing in the end tho, he offered to pay it if whoever else had the bid didn't want it. I don't think they should be any cancelling at all, maybe unless it is a player no one else has bid on. If we allow cancelling bids, then the rule should be what Radiokiller did.

[DaCityKats]

just got back on, reading whats going on.

if the person with the 2nd bid still wants the player, then the top bid can be cancelled. But if they don't then the leading bid has to stick by their commitment. people have been taking bids back the entire time, in order to take a bid back you must first contact the 2nd highest bidder to see if that person is still interested. if they are the bid than goes back to what they placed before you made your bid. if they do not want the bid on that player anymore, than you have to stay committed to that bid. if you go over than you are SOL.

if you are not ready to get into a bidder war with guys than just stop bidding.

[Munch4455]

Just so you guys are aware, Carpanfan96(Colts) edited his post back to saying he matched the $10 bid. So there is no longer an issue.

[R0CKnR0LLA]

rams bid

Vincent Jackson $15

[Munch4455]

Tampa Bay Buccaneers Officially Sign:

RB Ryan Grant $1

Cap Remaining: $9

[R0CKnR0LLA]

rams officially sign Jake Scott, OG, Titans $1

[jamos14]

Chargers : Laurent Robinson 7 dollars

[Munch4455]

Tampa Bay Buccaneers bid:

WR Laurent Robinson $9

[kman72]

Saints Sign Ben Grubbs $11

and Bobbie williams $1

cap $22

[HeatCheck]

Buffalo Bills officially sign:

QB Dennis Dixon $4

RB Michael Bush $3